LuisCarlos17f
Legend
I suspect Roll for Combat's Battlezoo will not appear as 3PP in D&DBeyond.
Just depends on how it functions down the road. The current entries were invited but it could just be a trial phase. If they open it up to everyone willing to agree to certain minimal requirements (i.e. no offensive material) and Roll f or Combat could make money on the deal, I'd wager we'd see it up there.I suspect Roll for Combat's Battlezoo will not appear as 3PP in D&DBeyond.
He’s also referred to his own channel as a failure because of his refusal to play the algorithm game. Sad because I actually like a lot of what Linda and him discuss on it.Just to let you know, Stephen's partner on the stream, Mark Seifter, just openly said he hates the click bait images and titles. I had to laugh.
He’s also referred to his own channel as a failure because of his refusal to play the algorithm game. Sad because I actually like a lot of what Linda and him discuss on it.
I don't understand how people have come to take this turn of phrase as a reasoned and insightful rejoinder. To me, it sounds more like something a bad pick-up-artist would say after a failed seduction attempt*. Regardless, it's utterly ridiculous. People who participate in the toxic part of 'the game' are actively contributing to the toxification process. A process that, for social media platforms and similar two-sided market situations like YouTube, are becoming so prevalent that they are getting their own specific unflattering terminology. "The game" is making places like YouTube, Facebook, and similar so nearly useless to the viewer base that it is only previous investment (technical and emotional/social buy-in) and lack of data/audience/social network portability that are keeping people on said platforms. Any number of times in history**, various industries have been rife with objectionable business tactics. I see no way that that being the only way they could participate in said business at the time somehow being a reasonable excuse or deflection of the criticism that the tactic was, in fact, objectionable. 'hey baby, it's not my fault lying and deception are accepted norms in the scene, I'm just playing the hand dealt me' or something. **and yeah, I can't be too specific with this, but you all have your own examples.Like I said don't hate the player, hate the game.
There's good content on RFC. I'm a subscriber. I have purchased a lot of the Battlezoo products - and they're great.This entire "click bait" issue for Roll for Combat is making people miss out a ton of useful content. If you watch the stream summarizing the OGL story, you can see all of the ways they kept the story moving. I remember reading the thread on ENWorld when the story broke and a lot of people said some very unkind things about the channel and how it couldn't be accurate. Stephen even does a callout to that thread when discussing it.
Roll for Combat went over OGL 1.1 in detail. They had a contract lawyer on discussing the ins and outs of it. They found a guy that did his PHD on the OGL. They had Ryan Dancy on to discuss the issue. And this was all when they were a tiny little channel. I remember at the time they were the people I was reading about covering it. Say what you want about Stephen, and he does have a lot of hot takes in him, but he's been informative about things like the VTT that I haven't seen elsewhere. Getting off my rant here, I promise.
never catch a falling knife…Seems like a good time to buy in instead of selling stock...
Pro tip: you can hate both.Like I said don't hate the player, hate the game.