trappedslider
Legend
who knew that there so many grumpy old people on this site.
Everyone who looked at that "how old are you?" poll thread a while back?who knew that there so many grumpy old people on this site.
who knew that there so manygrumpyold people on this site.
who knew that there so many grumpy old people on this site.
I'd try that.(In Germany it was Tuna on Pizza at the Pizza Hut.
Ugh, c'mon Germans, you almost had me!Clumps of canned tuna :-/ ).
Heh. Come to Japan.
Bad attitude to have if you are trying to convince fans to buy AD&D, instead of the older rules where you have to share profits with Arneson.Uhhh...
![]()
But his home game was not run RAW. There are many posts by Gary here in ENworld and elsewhere, as well as stories shared by those who played in his games, that he ignored many rules, made things up on the spot, and otherwise did not run his home games following all the rules in AD&D.Agreed. He had written quite positively to Lee Gold in Alarums & Excursions early on, and then after the success of D&D, he wrote to the APAzine threatening them with legal action for their D&D/AD&D coverage of houserules. I suspect as time went by he decided "his" version of the game (the one he was running at home) was the correct one and others were "playing it wrong" -- a very common attitude among gamers at the time. Heck, Ron Edwards basically says those same things when he talks about the games people play: "you're playing it wrong," "you don't know what good gaming is," "stop having fun with things I don't like!" (Okay, I made that last one up.) This is one of the reasons all of the new classes in Dragon were "NPC classes" -- if they're meant only for the NPCs, then there's no impact to the player-facing side since only the DM will ever need to know the specifics of abilities.