Zardnaar
Legend
As I just said, it's quite possible she hasn't killed anyone, and therefore has no need of redemption.
Perhaps but see where it goes.
As I just said, it's quite possible she hasn't killed anyone, and therefore has no need of redemption.
I mean, you could have both, very easily.As I just said, it's quite possible she hasn't killed anyone, and therefore has no need of redemption.
Sounds like we watched completely different shows.There is no "good" sister and "evil" sister, they are both victims.
I mean, not really. Paul is just reading into the show a lot more deeply, whereas you're responding to the surface-level messaging. That doesn't mean he's right and you're wrong, note, but they're quite different approaches to reading the text. I'm reminded of countless English classes - there's always the very confident and not stupid person who has the most superficial and obvious possible reading of a text - and they're rarely completely wrong, but they're the guy who is very confident Frankenstein was "doing his best" and the monster was just that, a monster, and so on. That's certainly what ol' Franky himself thinks.Sounds like we watched completely different shows.
Sounds like we watched completely different shows.
My partner believes Frankenstein is an allegory of post-natal depression.but they're the guy who is very confident Frankenstein was "doing his best" and the monster was just that, a monster, and so on. That's certainly what ol' Franky himself thinks.
Star Wars has a weird relationship with capacity for evil and redemption. I mean, Anakin was redeemed even though he murdered a room full of 7 year olds.I don't know if Mae is evil for going after these Jedi, but she's definitely willing to go to some nasty lengths. In her first fight she attacks innocents to provoke the Jedi, and then attempts a deadly strike against a bystander to force her opponent to leave an opening by saving him. If she truly believes this Jedi deserves death, she couldn't rely on her to save the bystander, so she's willing to risk deadly collateral in pursuit of her goal.
Yeah I don't buy it either. I see it getting downvoted in places where people can review-bomb it and stuff, but it reeks of an organised 4Chan campaign-type deal. It just lacks any real point that people could be honestly mad about en masse.I don't believe that. I think social media just amplifies outlier voices and toxicity by its very nature.
Agree. If that was true we'd see some sign of it here. A genuine "at war with itself" was TLJ (let's not relitigate it right now!), but the only hate I'm seeing here is from the guy who hates all the live-action stuff, which is fine but clearly not what the review-bombing stuff is about. It's similar on various Star Wars subreddits - I'm not seeing people hating. Some people are a little bored, but that's very different.But I choose not to believe that Star Wars fandom is at war with itself over this show.
That's an interesting take, I can see that given that she experienced it. I feel like seeing it primarily as an allegory slightly detracts from its foundational relationship to sci-fi - but then maybe it's both.My partner believes Frankenstein is an allegory of post-natal depression.