Exactly! Now you got it!What about a veteran of decades of war who turn their back on their lord and went ronin?
Exactly! Now you got it!What about a veteran of decades of war who turn their back on their lord and went ronin?
I'm fine with it. Magic is just as much a thing in most fantasy settings as war and agriculture. Why shouldn't it have its own patron?There’s nothing I dislike more in a setting than a “god of arcane magic”.
The Realms method, which is similar, works for me too.
Care to back that up? How is a D&D cleric less of a cleric than Spider-Man is?Closer than what D&D has.
Yup. Fairness is subjective and nuanced.Perhaps you are right about most games, but I am really okay with D&D having a more asymmetrical approach to balance and what you would perceive as "fairness". Classes should work, feel and interact differently with the world around then.
If it makes sense for a cleric to lose his powers for betraying his own beliefs, so be it. It's part of the experience of playing as this kind of classes.
How are those things remotely the same?Why do we let everyone roll for stealth checks then? Why not go back to percentile tables for rogue abilities? Sorry, Mr. wizard, you’re a wizard, you can’t stealth even though you aren’t wearing armor and have a high DEX. Shoulda joined the thieves guild like me!
Sure.Well dang, ya know, sure seems like there’s more than a few DMs who still want that nuclear option though.
How are those things remotely the same?
Seriously. I do not understand this argument.
Hiding isn't about class fantasy and where your power comes from.If the argument is that not every class should follow the same formula, then I counter that we don’t need every class to roll d20 tests. Rogues should be the only ones who can stealth and that formula should be based on percentile dice rather d20 mechanics.
Cause ya know…formula doesn’t have to be the same.
Hiding isn't about class fantasy and where your power comes from.