Micah Sweet
Level Up & OSR Enthusiast
Yeah I have no idea what that means."Kayfabe" is the perfect word for it, but maybe it's too jargony.![]()
Yeah I have no idea what that means."Kayfabe" is the perfect word for it, but maybe it's too jargony.![]()
Where is that written?
So...no diagetic FKS for you today?At least it's popular jargon as opposed to the chinchilla-facing, guru-stance combat-as-sandart kind of jargon we usually use to make sure we collectively need to have our lunch money taken.
Are there DMs that don't do that? For serious.Where is that written?
Again, twenty years of hearing how much people absolutely hate it unless they're the ones getting to ruin people's characters using those rules.If they feel that way. Who's to say that will be the case? We can only speak for ourselves.
Let's put it this way: I'm hoping you're masking cursing.So...no diagetic FKS for you today?
I wonder if googling it would have some results?Let's put it this way: I'm hoping you're masking cursing.
I'm not paying $50 for that book, and I don't use D&D Beyond. If I'm wrong about my information (based on what I've seen here) please correct me on the details.We're disagreeing on what the setting logic and class fantasy says. As I have repeatedly pointed out in the real world once a priest is sacramentally invested in at least some of the largest churches then that is done. And can't be revoked. And in the absence of actual magic I would expect things to be based on that.
As for fiction first, I don't want my fiction to say "You think we have a traitor in our Paladin order? Everyone down to the courtyard and we'll see who can no longer Lay On Hands." Or for that to be a sensible solution.
Me three
As mentioned it for example gives multiple approaches to worldbuilding including rolling your own and using one presented (which is Greyhawk in the DMG) and multiple approaches to session prep and goals. It does not however give all possible options.
You're claiming it doesn't do something when you haven't read it?
Your personal anecdotes mean just as much as mine do. I have decades of experience too.Again, twenty years of hearing how much people absolutely hate it unless they're the ones getting to ruin people's characters using those rules.
Basically it's the professional wrestling term for not breaking character. It was originally a coded warning (because no one knew what kayfabe meant it could be said as a warning that there were people who didn't know it was all an act) but the bad guys want to be dastardly and know they should lose and play it as if they are actually losing.Yeah I have no idea what that means.