D&D (2024) I have the DMG. AMA!

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad


At least it's popular jargon as opposed to the chinchilla-facing, guru-stance combat-as-sandart kind of jargon we usually use to make sure we collectively need to have our lunch money taken.
So...no diagetic FKS for you today?

I'll have you know that I charmed my ways into the arms of many ladies with my explanation of story-first emergent storytelling in a neo-trad setting!
 





We're disagreeing on what the setting logic and class fantasy says. As I have repeatedly pointed out in the real world once a priest is sacramentally invested in at least some of the largest churches then that is done. And can't be revoked. And in the absence of actual magic I would expect things to be based on that.

As for fiction first, I don't want my fiction to say "You think we have a traitor in our Paladin order? Everyone down to the courtyard and we'll see who can no longer Lay On Hands." Or for that to be a sensible solution.

Me three

As mentioned it for example gives multiple approaches to worldbuilding including rolling your own and using one presented (which is Greyhawk in the DMG) and multiple approaches to session prep and goals. It does not however give all possible options.

You're claiming it doesn't do something when you haven't read it?
I'm not paying $50 for that book, and I don't use D&D Beyond. If I'm wrong about my information (based on what I've seen here) please correct me on the details.
 


Yeah I have no idea what that means.
Basically it's the professional wrestling term for not breaking character. It was originally a coded warning (because no one knew what kayfabe meant it could be said as a warning that there were people who didn't know it was all an act) but the bad guys want to be dastardly and know they should lose and play it as if they are actually losing.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top