DrunkonDuty
he/him
Most of the Australian population does cluster in the large cities. Something like 18 mil. out of 26 mil. live in the state capitals. With most of the rest living along the east coast.
In case you were unaware, there's a long running Canadian cartoon series called "Fugget About It." Mob boss Jimmy Falcone is moved to Regina, Saskatchewan, by Witness Protection. I think it's on Hulu these days.
One of my best friends in college was from Vermillion, SD.It can beg. But then Anamoose, ND, will wave at it, and Trona will feel big by comparison.
(Sorry, ND - I keep using you as an example, and I probably shouldn't. But then you go and have towns named, "Anamoose".)
I’ve disagreed with people on here before, but never so thoroughly as with what you just posted. Legit everything you said is the polar opposite for me. Damn. That’s impressive.
I hear you, I’m in Montana, East coast ideas of remote or rural are comical….but they they have a cryptid in Jersey none the less.There is nothing remotely rural or barren about New Jersey.
That estimate is low for Los Angeles. A whole lot of immigrants avoid the census here.That's like saying, "just because there are places that are below 0F, doesn't mean that someplace that is 50F is not cold."
When the example is in the middle of the scale, it should not be claimed as an extreme of that scale.
Well, the population density of Atlanta is about 3,700 people per square mile. Los Angeles is around 8,200 people per square mile. Boston is 13,800 or so. New York City is 29,300 per square mile.
Which is to say, it seems high for a place that isn't a city, because we forget how insanely high the density is in cities.