D&D 5E D&D and who it's aimed at

Scribe

Legend
Erol Otus isnt my example, but I'm sure we can run around and cherry pick examples all we like. :)

Heck, I'll even take early 5e over the more recent stuff.
 

log in or register to remove this ad





Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
I can see that. However, a lot of 5e art (especially the monsters) are just portraits with nothing happening or context also.
Sure. I just think that a lot of 5e's landscape art is just more interesting and attention-catching than most of Elmore's. Like this:
1650925386346.png

1650925454614.png

1650925615607.png
1650925831637.png

I think Elmore's art quality is pretty good, his landscape/adventuring party shots just kind of feel more "staged" to me than most of 5e's. Some of them painfully so. Like this one. What are those guys looking at? Why are they standing like that? What's with their poses? Compared to the adventuring party shot I posted above (the one with the fairy dragons and halfling), I just prefer the 5e art. The adventuring party is clearly in the process of making their way through a forest. They're scouting, actively in the middle of an adventure through the wilds. And the colors stand out more than most of Elmore's art. It feels more "real/genuine" to me than just a lot of Elmore's art.

I'm not going to say that Elmore's art style is inferior to these 5e landscape/adventuring party artwork . . . I just prefer 5e's and think that there are a few things in them that they just objectively get better than Elmore usually did (posing, colors, making the landscape interesting, etc).
 

Attachments

  • 1650925580606.png
    1650925580606.png
    897.6 KB · Views: 35

Retreater

Legend
What are those guys looking at? Why are they standing like that? What's with their poses?
I think Elmore's technique involves (or at least used to) taking pictures of models and then drawing them, reusing them, plugging them into different settings. Where I live in Kentucky isn't too far from where he worked. A friend of mine used to model for him. I don't know which character(s) she represented though.
But yeah, I agree some are better, some are worse. I just don't agree that all of the best art is being done now. There's stuff to like from all eras.
 

Levistus's_Leviathan

5e Freelancer
I just don't agree that all of the best art is being done now. There's stuff to like from all eras.
Definitely agreed. 100% accurate to say. There's more than a few pieces of 5e artwork that I extremely dislike (most of Tyranny of Dragons, some of the Gem Dragons and Draconians from Fizban's, etc), but in my personal taste, 5e has a lot more really good art than bad art.
 

Parmandur

Book-Friend
Yeah, I just cannot imagine how someone could see art as awesome as this:
View attachment 156110
View attachment 156111
View attachment 156112
. . . and somehow think that D&D would be better off with art looking like this:
View attachment 156113
View attachment 156114View attachment 156117

Erol Otus is certainly a better artist than I am . . . but I also think that this art looks awful. D&D art is just waaaaay better now. I would never, ever want D&D's art style to go back to looking like that abomination.

Nostalgia is a hell of a drug.
Hey, why not both??

Erol Otus isn't bad art, it's stylized.
 

Parmandur

Book-Friend
I am rather gobsmacked at the idea that Sword &Sorcery isn't represented in 5E. I mean, the amount of Adventure material that has been put out that is Sword & Sorcery style is rather high.
 

Remove ads

Top