Lanefan
Victoria Rules
Curious - is that mostly due to character-concept reasons or mechanical/optimization reasons?I think it depends how you look at it. In 5E I have only played 1 character past level 3 without multiclassing,
Curious - is that mostly due to character-concept reasons or mechanical/optimization reasons?I think it depends how you look at it. In 5E I have only played 1 character past level 3 without multiclassing,
I'm not sure what you aren't buying about it.I don't know if I buy this. I see a lot of fighter multiclasses, but I actually rarely see Fighter as the starting class. I see Rogue most commonly, but also classes with Wisdom saves are more common IME than fighter is to start.
That is not to say I never see them, just not real often.
Character concept mostly. Usually to make something work for my character idea that I can't get on a single class.Curious - is that mostly due to character-concept reasons or mechanical/optimization reasons?
That fighter is the most used starting class.I'm not sure what you aren't buying about it.
That fighter is the most used starting class.
The thing that leaps out to me is that Barbarian, also a (supposedly) simple and easy-to-play class, is so low across the board. Any thoughts on why that is?View attachment 290818
This is what the data shows about starting classes by level. The graph is a little messy but I thought it better to include all info. Fighter and Rogue are the lines up at the top. IMO it's hard to dismiss the data when the pattern is there basically every level.
The thing that leaps out to me is that Barbarian, also a (supposedly) simple and easy-to-play class, is so low across the board. Any thoughts on why that is?
1. Conceptually it’s also much more narrowThe thing that leaps out to me is that Barbarian, also a (supposedly) simple and easy-to-play class, is so low across the board. Any thoughts on why that is?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.