pete284
Explorer
I'm currently running one 5e game (7th level PCs) and two OSR games (Swords & Wizardry Complete and Shadowdark). All are using the same players. As a GM I enjoy running the two OSR games more as there is less prep and they are easier to run. There is not a lot between the two OSR games, SD works better online mainly due to the light mechanic in Foundry. If I didn't own SD I wouldn't buy it again if I already had S&W, but think it is a good choice as any if you don't own any OSR rules. We have had more character deaths in 6 OSR games than in 4 years of several 5e campaigns already. One benefit it has given players a chance to try several different classes they wouldn't choose out of a 5e game when they use a tandard array.
I have noticed the players play very differently in the OSR games, they they a lot more thoughtful on decision-making; are very careful of what they fight and and do more RP with potential enemies (trying to avoid combat or recruit them as hirelings). 5e they treat very much as a video game and trying to maximise every turn using abilities and spells.
As a GM I prefer the OSR but my players seem to like both in different ways, for different experiences.
I have noticed the players play very differently in the OSR games, they they a lot more thoughtful on decision-making; are very careful of what they fight and and do more RP with potential enemies (trying to avoid combat or recruit them as hirelings). 5e they treat very much as a video game and trying to maximise every turn using abilities and spells.
As a GM I prefer the OSR but my players seem to like both in different ways, for different experiences.