Then perhaps you'd care to reiterate? I read your posts where you explained that, at your table, you impose your own conception of alignment. But what does that bring to the table?Yes I have. To both.pemerton said:You haven't explained what is usefully brought to the table by alignment rules in circumstances where there is significant disagreement, at the table, over how to morally judge the events that come up in play.
If your answer is the ability to adjudicate the effects of a Talisman of Pure Good, then I guess my follow-up question is is such a corner case item worth a whole system edifice grounded in moral controversy in order to support it?