Crothian
First Post
What makes a ranger with a bow or warlock any more boring/dull than a fighter, paladin, rogue, or any non-full caster class?
The player
What makes a ranger with a bow or warlock any more boring/dull than a fighter, paladin, rogue, or any non-full caster class?
I was referring to paraxisIn 4e and 3e you had no incentive to manoeuvre under most circumstance so it was less dynamic than a melee guy, especially in 4e when they coiuld have a lot of varied options.
I only mentioned two classes who I said were similar not sure what you are saying
.
There is also the invocation that makes you push the hit enemy 10 ft and the one that makes its range into 300 ft. Take all 3 and it is specialization, imo."Specialize"? It takes one invocation, available to every pact and patron.
It's not a matter of specializing. It's just what every warlock is expected to do if they care about ranged damage.
This thread is about damage, so those other invocations aren't relevant (and were not being discussed).There is also the invocation that makes you push the hit enemy 10 ft and the one that makes its range into 300 ft. Take all 3 and it is specialization, imo.
I'm playing a warlock in 5E and I don't mind using the same attack nearly all of the time.At which point I would posit that the player doesn't find spamming eldritch blast to be boring since he has been using it for several levels now and is still willing to sink a third invocation into it.
For my understanding, each beam no matter if they are on the same target or not have to have their own separate attack rolls correct? This is why they get the modifier per?