L
lowkey13
Guest
*Deleted by user*
Funk 'em. If the players are whining and complaining about the setting I'm running adventures in that I prep in my spare time while they're at home watching a movie, or going out to eat, or whatever, they can suck my Dilly Bar....expected whining and complaining from players...
Yeah, how are you going to do that without pissing off some GH fans? Some want it rebooted to the original boxed set. Some people like the Carl Sergeant era. Some like the Adventure Begins/Living Greyhawk Gazzetter era. Some want all the Living Greyhawk changes to become official. Some want the Paizohawk stuff to be official.
What makes you say that. We know that Mearls has talked about Greyhawk and "gets it". We know he has an expert knowledge of 5e design principles.This strikes me as a very wrong-headed theory that only a person with a passing knowledge of how creative industries work, and more importantly a specious understanding of this instance we are currently discussing, would engage in.
Wasn't he working on his own version of 4e Dawn War / Nerath / Nentir Vale setting in is most recent personal campaign.If Mercer didn't exist, I think Mearls would have worked on a 5e Greyhawk.
Oh. No one cares what we think one way or the other.I'm a Gen-Xer. You can blame us. I don't mind.![]()
This I kind of wish the Setting books for Magic the Gathering were written inclusively.I kind of feel the same way, but I don't blame WotC. They are just responding to demand or perceived demand, after all.
My favorite edition was 4E, so I've been through the feelings of dissonance and disassociation that a significant number of gamers want to buy stuff that I don't want, and don't want to buy stuff that I do want before. I've made peace with that, and I just buy the stuff from WotC that I'm interested in, and increase the probability that WotC will make a similar product by a fraction.
In the meantime, I can come up with my own stuff.