Nyaricus said:My own Delux character sheet is 4 pages long, but is, IMO, better-organised than that mess. Skills, feats, ability scores, basic character background/traits all make it on the first page. The second is combat, the 3rd is magic, and the fourth is Misc - languages, weapon prof groups, equpiment (taking up more than 1/2 the page), money, carrying capacity and a Credits section.
Ironically they are, but looking at the wizards sheets they don't seem to be fitting on a lot of info for the space it takes up. I looked at a full-page veiw of mine and their, and I seem to have a better set-up, IMO.MerricB said:Sounds pretty similar to the Wizards character sheets.![]()
mhacdebhandia said:I have always used and probably will always use my own character sheets - I do them up in Word with copious use of lovely, lovely tables. It's easy to just shift things around as the need arises.
I don't mind skills on the back so much. It reminds me of the old deluxe 4 page character folders where the two main pages were the front and the back (and you opened it to see the "inside" two pages). This allows a combat oriented front sheet and a skill oriented back sheet.sjmiller said:As someone who does a bit of design and layout in my day job, I find them just plain ugly. As far as information presented, I frankly do not like their choice of what goes where. Skills should not be relegated to the back of the sheet. Since they insisted that skills and feats are a crutial part of the most current editions, why not make them more accessable?