I think the 'trained in Arcana' was merely referencing the character taking an extra specialization in the Arcana skill. From what I think I've read. SWSE's skill system allowed characters to designate a certain number of skills as trained.Irda Ranger said:These are presented in the alternative. That means that "Arcane training" is different from multi-classing. This is new information.
Prior to this, every reference to the multi-classing rules referred to taking "class training." There were no choices to be made; you either have Fighter training or you don't. This seems to suggest that there's "training" and then there's full-on multi-classing.
If I had to guess, using prior editions of D&D for the analogy, I'd guess that "training" is a bit like taking 0th level in a class without impacting the level of the class you're in. But that's pure speculation, and the 4E devs may have a more elegant solution.
Right. And skills that one selects as "trained" allow you to do other things with the skill that an untrained person can't do. It's more than a numeric boost.Bishmon said:I think the 'trained in Arcana' was merely referencing the character taking an extra specialization in the Arcana skill. From what I think I've read. SWSE's skill system allowed characters to designate a certain number of skills as trained.
Cool. Where have you read that?Sir Brennen said:Right. And skills that one selects as "trained" allow you to do other things with the skill that an untrained person can't do. It's more than a numeric boost.
Bishmon said:Cool. Where have you read that?
JRRNeiklot said:4e is a fine time to make a true bard and get rid of the arcane spells altogether.
grimslade said:What if Rituals need a certain Arcana score to be able to cast? You could have multiple classes even Martial powered casting rituals.