Re: For Jester and others who just joined in...
Nathanael said:
Look, you lot, if you can't be bothered to read the 6 pages of posts, then at least read mine so you know what my arguments are and can stop misquoting me.
They don't concern Devil/Daemon stats. They don't concern PrCs. They concern rules for selling your soul, human sacrifice, drug use, extremely graphic artwork (which WOTC artists say they have to keep redoing because it's not 'bloody' or 'naked' enough)etc.
I also don't care what YOU do in YOUR game. I'm concerned with the brand image and, if what the blurb on the advert says is true, and if two magazines and the BoVD itself need to be shrinkwrapped, then we're not talking your typical D&D stuff here. This will be linked to the D&D brand, not as some offshoot book for certain people and... you know, I tire of saying all of this over and over. Go read my other posts.
Well, for the record I've been following this thread with interest since the beginning, and actually paying a lot of attention to what you're posting.
I guess I didn't put my feelings forward very clearly. I should have left out the examples. All right, let me try again.
I realize that what you object to isn't Demogorgon's stats. It seems like what you're more concerned about is the roleplaying aspect of interacting with Demogorgon. There was an infamous pc cleric of Juiblex in my game years ago. He slew many another pc, as well as lots of important npcs, before he was finally laid low by another pc. During this time he made many sacrifices to his demon prince. It would be nice to have a consistent system to handle his rewards. Now, obviously, I dealt with it just fine; and certainly having that sort of pc in the campaign isn't for every group. But he made for great role-playing possibilities; by the end, almost every other pc active in the game was out to get him. He tortured, used drugs and poisons, dealt with demons and was nasty and evil in ways the rules just don't cover.
Now, as I understand your concerns, basically you're afraid that this book is going to cause an uproar against dnd and force it back into the shadows. Well, I remember all the anti-rpg propoganda in the 80's and I'd hate to see a return to it; I was once handed a flyer by one of my jr. high teachers about how dnd promoted voodoo, witchcraft, assassination, poison use, demon worship, etc. But you know what? If a "mature audiences" book was going to do that, don't you think it would have already happened with the Black Dog stuff? Heck, don't you think games like Vampire would have done it? Or LARPing! Look at those kids, living in a fantasy world, why they might assault you and drink your blood!, blah blah blah. I just don't see it happening.
I certainly don't intend any insult to you, and I respect your opinion; I just disagree with you. I think the BoVD is a chance for dnd to address some genuinely fresh material that's long since overdue and, actually, somtimes necessary. For example, how do you determine whether a pc can resist being tortured for information? Or how long he can resist? Or what's left of him afterward? After all, most tortures can be ruinous to the body and mind. Could you cast a spell with after your thumbs were crushed by a vise? How much damage do you take if you're slammed inside an iron maiden?
Sure, I can make up answers; so can you. But they'll be different answers. And sometimes, when the pcs walk into a dungeon's torture chamber, the giant guardian might want to throw them in the iron maiden and slam it shut.