Bracers of Striking & weapon adjustment spells

[Crothian]

Hmmm...Keen doesn't work on Bludgeoning weapons, so you're gonna have to house rule the hell out of it.

Or use the blunt version that I'm sure is in one of the many expansion books by one of the 3rd party people. I think Arms and Armor has a version of it for instance.

 

[kreynolds]

Or use the blunt version that I'm sure is in one of the many expansion books by one of the 3rd party people. I think Arms and Armor has a version of it for instance.

Impact, from Magic of Faerun.

 

[Crothian]

Impact, from Magic of Faerun.

That works, too.

With all the enchantments that are out there, you can ussually find what you are looking for.

 

[Brekki]

As I said ... we consider the bracers to give all enhancements to the extremities. Since my hands are claws ("claws of the vampire" or "claws of the bear"), I chose the "keen" enhancement. "Impact" would have no sense for me

 

[hong]

Which is what AGGEMAM meant, since you mean this, and this means what he meant, which means what you meant, which means....well...basically there's just a whole lot of meaning going around.

... if you know what I mean, and I think you do.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, I'LL BE HERE ALL WEEK.

And wasn't "Whole lotta meaning" the BESTEST AC-DC song EVAR, or what?

And kreynolds, play nice before you make Caliban's head explodiate. Again.

 

[kreynolds]

And kreynolds, play nice before you make Caliban's head explodiate. Again.

I'm being nice.

 

[Crothian]

I'm being nice.

The sad thing is it's true

 

[Caliban]

You mean like your Super AC Dwarf in Living City?

My dwarf doesn't take advantage of any vague or ambiguous rulings. He has only used feats and abilities that are clearly detailed in the core rules or in the D&D FAQ (which is official for the Living Greyhawk campaign, so I have to use it's rulings even if I disagree with them).

He doesn't use any builder book feats or spells at all.

Any more baseless accusations you want to throw around?

 

[kreynolds]

My dwarf doesn't take advantage of any vague or ambiguous rulings. He has only used feats and abilities that are clearly detailed in the core rules or in the D&D FAQ (which is official for the Living Greyhawk campaign, so I have to use it's rulings even if I disagree with them).

Yet you have expressed your displeasure with being able to do it.

Any more baseless accusations you want to throw around?

Actually, you'll notice that I didn't accuse you of anything. I simply asked you a question. Why you're getting so pissed off, I don't know, and I don't really care either. Would you like to bitch some more for no particular reason? Perhaps making an ass out of yourself by being a jerkoff will make you feel better? Then by all means...vent.

 

[AGGEMAM]

Just to get the discussion back on track, I would like to say that it is not such an obvious intent of the rules that I feel I can ignore the rule, because multible druid/ranger spells are in fact animal or nature restricted version of more general spells of other classes I do not think it is that big a stretch to allow MW/GMW to work with natural weapons as well as manufactured weapons.

It is what is written afterall, and clearly some of the designers think it should that way proven by the fact that one of the requirements of Bracers of Striking is either MF or MW. If the designers of MOF thought that MW/GMW was restricted to manufactured weapons then the only logically required spell for the bracers is MF.