dcollins
Explorer
andargor said:Hmm, IMHO that's just the way it is written. "spell-like effect" may not necessarily mean "spell-like ability" in this phrase. But we've read stuff before interpreted several different ways, haven't we?
Well, I think that one's pretty ironclad in context. The section starts out by saying "Only spells and spell-like abilities are subject to spell resistance". When the same paragraph later says that a wondrous item effect is "spell-like", I can't imagine that that they actually meant the separately identified category. Oh, and it also refers to spells by a cleric or an androsphinx by different language in the same section. It's pretty clear that a distinction has been made there.
