kermit4karate
A strong opinion is still only an opinion.
I want to reduce the temperature of this, but yes, again, I can't imagine trusting ChatGPT to perform a podcast transcription, especially not without doublechecking it and asking it to try again, repeatedly, until it gets it right. I do that throughout the day. When I'm asking it for help producing computer scripts, providing CLI commands to perform things, specific terms that should appear in logs I'm analyzing, it routinely provides incorrect info on its initial tries. I almost always have to ask it to, effectively, try harder, which is always does.To clean up a podcast transcription? Or to make an informational video about the unreliability of AI? Which decision is questionable?
That's not what he did, though, is it?
It may not always get it correct in the end, but sometimes these kinds of anti-AI arguments are biased. Many people have decided that AI is bad, and there's deep confirmation bias out there about it.
Is it perfect? No. Is it better for some things than others? Yes. Can most of its mistakes be corrected by simply rephrasing a prompt? Also yes.
Will it eventually lead to our destruction? Unknown.... Possibly also yes. But not before everyone with a white-collar job has to use some version of it just to remain employed.