thewittybard
First Post
Alright new development. Let me post my correspondence with the DM.
Psion is 5 levels of erudite and 5 levels of thrallherd. I am assuming that he will likely have dominate and focus on it. Also, being an outsider might be overkill (you are still allowed as long as its from any of the books we are using) , since i like your idea where players will automatically fail when they try to dominate each other unless they are out of control (like if Barbarian is in a frenzy).
Now, all I'm asking is if it would be outrageous for the DM to state this as a house rule. If so, then disregard his advice. I don't want any of you to feel like I was wasting your time if the DM simply makes a house rule that renders the necessity for anti-dominate character designs obsolete. I think the main benefit of having that as a rule is that it emphasizes the importance of the party working together toward a common goal, rather than fighting amongst each other. In these particular circumstances, I would lean towards saying that the party is too immature to benefit from the added challenge and potential of having realistic alignment-driven clashes of opinion and ideology. Of course, it might be more interesting for a mature group of players to make room for internal conflict. Perhaps that day will come =]