thalmin said:As far as I know, TSR and then Wizards have made corrections in every new printing of the PHB. The first time they ever made an announcement about it was when they first printed 3.5.
Errata, not revision. Basically, if it's in the errata file at the WOTC website, they have probably fixed it, along with a bunch of typos.beaver1024 said:Wow! Did they fix Darkness? Holy Word? Polymorph?
Jdvn1 said:I don't think most companies boast new printings.
It's just not done.
Moulin Rogue said:This means I gotta travel a fair distance to get to some gaming places where I can physically inspect PHBs before I buy... so I'd like to get a feel for whether I am likely to come across a 2nd printing of a 3.5 PHB if I make such a journey in the near future, or if I should wait a bit longer for these 2nd printings to work their way onto more shelves. So then, have YOU seen a 3.5 PHB 2nd printing in your gaming store?
Henry said:Depending on the company - I've seen many paperback novels proudly proclaiming things like, "Now in 11th printing!" and so on.
TSR made corrections along the way, but didn't catch some things. Also, they made the corrections they could easily fit into the same format. Remember, back in the days of 1E, everything had to be type-set, it wasn't on computer.BWP said:WOTC seem quite good at making errata available and integrating it into their print runs in a reasonably timely fashion; TSR were somewhat spotty at it. E.G, the 1st ed. PHB had numerous printings that never corrected any of the known errata, even years later (see http://www.acaeum.com/DDIndexes/SetPages/PHB.html for details), but the DMG had errata which was incorporated quite quickly in its printing history (http://www.acaeum.com/Library/ErrataDMG.html).