Why do you say it doesn't sound like controlling the victim? The original text says, "In human form the lizard lord rarely uses weapons, preferring instead to depend on his strong hypnotism ability. Creatures meeting the lizard lord’s gaze must save vs. spell at a -3 penalty or become susceptible to the lord’s suggestions." I assumed "suggestions" was like the spell and gave it a bit of an upgrade to domination because, you know, epic.
Domination seems too much like the Hawk Lord's
charm gaze to me.
Besides, suggestion isn't domination either.
Anyhow, from what I remember the AD&D
hypnotism was a cinematic "you are feeling sleepy" kind of mesmerism, like Kaa's hypnotic gaze in Disney's version of the
Jungle Book.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ILPl5FQaM"]
Jungle Book[/ame]
[Note: What? Enworld turns links to Youtube pages into embedded videos now? Or did it always work like that and I've never linked to a video before. I'd much rather have just had a link.]
We could have the gaze fascinate opponents who will then respond to
suggestion (as the spell) from the Lizard Lord?
Oh, and since we gave the
Hawk Lady Hawk
Lord some weapons we ought to give the lizard version some as well, even though he "rarely uses them". Maybe a repeating crossbow and a
dagger of venom?
Hold on, it was the
Wolf Lord that had an envenomed dagger in the original.
How does that make any kind of thematic sense? Wolves aren't poisonous!