D&D 5E D&D is Getting Unweildy

Addressing the OP only, a couple things.

One, I think you illustrated why new editions may be necessary for a game like D&D: It is an opportunity to consolidate and streamline years of new rules and books. There have been some threads lately complaining about editions, but I think they are actually a necessity for a huge, complex game like D&D. If D&D involved only a core rulebook and a few supplements, then it would be less necessary - but even a relatively sparse publication schedule like 5E involves 3-6 books a year, which add up over time. But the time 5.5 rolls out, there will have been about 40 hardcovers, half a dozen boxed sets and slip cases, plus miscellaneous and online stuff.

(And this not even touching the fact that a lot of folks like new editions - like re-learning the game all over again, in a new way. But that's tangential to my point above)

Secondly, WotC has done a good job with their starter sets, which seem to be popular and were smartly placed in Target as a gateway into the hobby. Meaning, for many it isn't just going to the hobby shop and seeing the wall of D&D books. Even there, you'll find a starter set and can start with a manageable box of rules.

And finally, related to both above, D&D tends to be a came for people who like complexity - for which the daunting nature of all the books isn't a bug in the system, but a fun new territory to explore.

Even for those for whom it is daunting in an unpleasant way, there's the tried-and-true way in which most people learn how to play: "apprenticing" with an established group. While I'm sure some people learn the game all together - a group of friends watch Stranger Things and decide to pick up Essentials and learn the game together - most people, as far as I can tell, still enter the hobby in the age-old apprenticeship model.

In summary, I don't think the unwieldy nature of the D&D product library is all that problematic, especially when you consider A) Edition updates every so many years (in this case, ten); B) the nature of most/many gamers as being at least somewhat intellectual and/or inquisitive; and C) The D&D tradition of "apprenticeship" as the main route into the hobby.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Just because I'm not using Tasha's doesn't mean I'm not a customer. I still picked up Spelljammer, for example.
My point was that if you aren't upgrading your core rules you aren't a customer for new rules supplements, and whether you are a customer for adventures is completely independent of that -- look at how many people buy Pathfinder APs despite playing 5E.
 

My point was that if you aren't upgrading your core rules you aren't a customer for new rules supplements, and whether you are a customer for adventures is completely independent of that -- look at how many people buy Pathfinder APs despite playing 5E.
Well, supposedly they are supposed to be keeping compatability to prior materials - though with the stuff I've seen in the latest documents, I'm truly doubting that.
 

Well, supposedly they are supposed to be keeping compatability to prior materials - though with the stuff I've seen in the latest documents, I'm truly doubting that.
Why. What in the first UA would make it so you couldn't play Curse of Strahd?
 

Remove ads

Top