Mistwell
Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
Based on whose expert valuation is WOTC worth less than 1 billion? You have experience in this area?In this thread. Hasbros not worth 23 billion.
Based on whose expert valuation is WOTC worth less than 1 billion? You have experience in this area?In this thread. Hasbros not worth 23 billion.
Based on whose expert valuation is WOTC worth less than 1 billion? You have experience in this area?
20-30x profit? Where did that come from?not really, that means 3B is in the ballpark while 5 is too high (20 to 30 times profit, with profit being around 50% for D&D)
there is no right value for this as the company value always takes projected performance into account. If you want current value free of that, you are better off estimating how much money you have to invest to get the same interest as the company generates in profit. Whether anyone will sell it for that is another matter and in part depends on what they expect the future performance to be.20-30x profit? Where did that come from?
I’ve heard a lot of company valuation formulae over the years.
there is no right value for this
You said it.
I’ve heard 3x revenue. Obviously share price x shares. Not heard 20 x profit before.
No offence, Z, but what you would conceivably pay isn’t really of much interest to me.X3 revenue would be around 500 million which was lower end of what I would conceivably pay.
No offence, Z, but what you would conceivably pay isn’t really of much interest to me.
Never heard revenue as a base, that also feels like a weird metric to me. I can have 10B revenue and either have losses of 1B, barely break even or a profit of 5B.... Profit at least makes more sense than revenue, even if there is no agreed upon factor (and I'd say in large part it does not exist because the stock price can be very speculative and is not based on today's valuation but "tomorrow"'s expected valuation).You said it.
I’ve heard 3x revenue. Obviously share price x shares. Not heard 20 x profit before.
Never heard revenue as a base, that also feels like a weird metric to me. I can have 10B revenue and either have losses of 1B, barely break even or a profit of 5B.... Profit at least makes more sense than revenue, even if there is no agreed upon factor (and I'd say in large part it does not exist because the stock price can be very speculative and is not based on today's valuation but "tomorrow"'s expected valuation).
Even with the stock price being all over the place, the low end was a factor of 13, so yes, I stiil like 15 to 25 as a reasonable range (as I said a higher factor would be based on expected growth, not today's performance), certainly more than 3 * revenue