overgeeked
B/X Known World
It is hard. But it's also worth all the blood, sweat, and tears it takes to get there. A few years ago people laughed at the thought of Starbucks being unionized, now some of them are.Unionization is hard!
It is hard. But it's also worth all the blood, sweat, and tears it takes to get there. A few years ago people laughed at the thought of Starbucks being unionized, now some of them are.Unionization is hard!
These two statements are contradictoryHasbro/WOTC doesn't need to touch the OGL to win that battle. It just has to launch its own VTT and use its power as market leader to drive players to it.
The Hasbro board has two former Microsoft vice presidents on it, so they know how to win that game.
because a random youtuber has more credibility than WotC's denialsWhy are people treating this video as fact?
No, but Discord's VTT features are...well let's just say minimal at best.I'm guessing Hasbro at least won't be buying Discord, which seems to be worth a good deal more than Hasbro!
Aka they are turning paranoid and trusting a rando who has already been wrongbecause a random youtuber has more credibility than WotC's denials
I think that is fundamentally wrong. If success for the community is only in getting bad things prevented, then there is never any incentive for a company to not try to implement bad things, because at worst they'll just reverse them and no harm no foul right? I think that if the people who made the decision faced the prospect of a ruined career and never working in an executive position again as a consequence, they might just be a bit less trigger happy with stupid ideas.Agreed. Irrespective of what he may or may not be directly responsible for, going after him is a distraction and doesn't actually fix anything.
From the perspective of the hobby, the real problem is the wrong-headed business strategy, not the guy who engineered it.
Considering that Discord was in talk about a year or two ago with Microsoft to be purchased for around $10 billion. No way Hasbro would have that kind of cash.No, but Discord's VTT features are...well let's just say minimal at best.
Assuming that firing Chris Cao won't prevent future harm is incredibly flawed logic.I think that is fundamentally wrong. If success for the community is only in getting bad things prevented, then there is never any incentive for a company to not try to implement bad things, because at worst they'll just reverse them and no harm no foul right? I think that if the people who made the decision faced the prospect of a ruined career and never working in an executive position again as a consequence, they might just be a bit less trigger happy with stupid ideas.