D&D General Does The D&D Movie Poster Feature Pathfinder Artwork?

The Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves movie poster was previewed today. It was created by an artist called Bosslogic, and features an ampersand containing various pieces of D&D monster art. The poster was on display at San Diego Comic Con as part of the official D&D movie promotional event.

However, one part of the poster appears to be Pathfinder's depiction of an intellect devourer. Is this the same art piece?

poster.jpeg


paizo_devourer.png

Paizo's Pathfinder 2 Bestiary (thanks to @Ir'revrykal for the pic)

It certainly looks like the same piece of art.

Now, the intellect devourer is a D&D monster which appeared way back in 1976, and has appeared in every edition of D&D since. Why does Pathfinder have artwork of one? Well, the creature was first released as Open Gaming Content 20 years ago under the Open Gaming License. Since then, other companies have used the monster, or created their own versions of it -- including Paizo in the Pathfinder RPG. The name and the stat blocks (including the Pathfinder version) are free to use.

The art? Not so much. Art commissioned by Paizo to illustrate its Bestiaries is not Open Gaming Content. While art can be OGC (nowhere in the OGL is the actual subject matter defined -- you can make any of your work OGC and available for use by others, from sheet music to 3D spaceship models), companies rarely designate it as so, and Paizo's intellect devourer art is no exception.


However, the 'open gaming license' tangent is a red herring. It's unlikely that Paramount was thinking in terms of open source TTRPG game rules when it made the poster, and this poster is not released using the OGL, so its terms are not relevant to it. More likely, somebody just assumed that that piece of art was created by WotC, not Paizo. The 'OGL' part of this conversation simply explains why Paizo has a version of the creature too, and why Paizo therefore commissioned art for their version.

For comparison, here is the D&D 5E version of the intellect devourer—presumably the piece of art that should have been used.

C21BED96-2003-456D-9664-40E94A3F20D1.jpeg

It's not the first time mistakes like this have happened. Back in 2018 Old Spice released a D&D class called The Gentleman... except that it was actually a Pathfinder class!


When it comes down to it, this is almost certainly just a simple mistake--a contracted artist, not as versed in TTRPGs as many people reading this, simply didn't realise that other companies could or had made their own versions of the creature, and used the one which fitted the space. Nothing to get upset about, and the companies will likely have a quick phone call and the matter will be settled.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
So reporters at SDCC describe the poster as "The movie's first poster was also revealed today, showing silhouettes of the main party holding their weapons in a golden dragon backdrop."

And then they show this poster:

d-ddomonlineteaser1-sheet-1658435402813.jpg



That's the poster all over the place on official reporting from Comic Con, like IGN. It appears to be the media asset released to official media

I think the other poster, the one that is the topic of this thread, is the BossLogic poster. Which I think is a fan made poster of his. Which is why everyone using that poster is using a picture taken with a cell phone of a poster on a wall, and not using a downloaded media asset that was released for media coverage.

I am not sure about that, because it's hard to confirm. But I am sure most of the more prominent reporters from Comic Con are not showing the poster that's the topic of this thread, but are instead showing this one I just linked to.
It been featured by mainstream outlets (such as The Hollywood Reporter, where I saw it first). Additionally, it was physically on display at the 'Tavern Experience' at SDCC which promoted the movie. They're using it. The artist, Bosslogic, was also there and was actually part of the experience, being installed behind the bar in the tavern as part of the OGN interview set up by Paramount. It's not a fan poster. It's probably going to quietly disappear, but it's not a fan poster.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

It been featured by mainstream outlets (such as The Hollywood Reporter, where I saw it first). Additionally, it was physically on display at the 'Tavern Experience' at SDCC which promoted the movie. They're using it. The artist, Bosslogic, was also there and was actually part of the experience, being installed behind the bar in the tavern as part of the OGN interview set up by Paramount. It's not a fan poster. It's probably going to quietly disappear, but it's not a fan poster.
I really hope it doesn't disappear. I want to get a copy for my game room
 

Stormonu

Legend
Has anybody been able to identify where the other monsters are from in the picture? The owlbear isn't the one in the 5E MM (though close), nor is the displacer beast. The DP strikes me as a Wayne Renald's piece, but I can't match it. Very curious what image the skull is from, as well as the octopus tentacles.
 

kenada

Legend
Supporter
My bet? Paizo and WotC will figure it out without to much sweat. Probably with WotC writing Paizo a check. Probably over one of thier mutual games.

But that’s just a hopeful guess.
Obviously, WotC will have to base 6e on Pathfinder 2e. It’s only fair. Use art from PF2, then you have use the system as well. 🙃
 

Retreater

Legend
Copying images found on the Internet for your movie poster (regardless of whether or not they're owned by WotC or not) is not a good sign. This indicates that the effects from the movie may be not completed - like why not show what the movie depicts as an Intellect Devourer? Is it important to the story/theme of the movie? Is it a cool design to get people to watch the movie?
 

darjr

I crit!
Copying images found on the Internet for your movie poster (regardless of whether or not they're owned by WotC or not) is not a good sign. This indicates that the effects from the movie may be not completed - like why not show what the movie depicts as an Intellect Devourer? Is it important to the story/theme of the movie? Is it a cool design to get people to watch the movie?
Have you read any of the rest of the thread?
 


Jer

Legend
Supporter
Copying images found on the Internet for your movie poster (regardless of whether or not they're owned by WotC or not) is not a good sign. This indicates that the effects from the movie may be not completed -
No that's not what's going on here. This is about an artist named "BossLogic" who does remix artwork. He was a guest at the tavern experience at SDCC and as part of that they hung up the poster he created for the movie - which is a remix of art assets from the movie itself (the silhouettes on his poster are a direct rip and remix of the ones on the official poster) and from random images of D&D monsters he apparently found googling on the internet. Which I guess is how he puts together his artwork in general. As part of his guest hosting experience at the tavern they hung up the movie poster he created for the movie.

It's not work done by a professional marketer for the movie - it's a weird tie-in with an Internet-famous celebrity person.

(Calling it fan art is not quite right either, because it is a marketing move. But it's also not a professional poster done by the marketing department. As a side note I'm relieved because I'm clearly not the target audience for BossLogic's artwork because that poster looks hideous to me.)
 



Remove ads

Latest threads

Remove ads

AD6_gamerati_skyscraper

Remove ads

Upcoming Releases

Top