Dr Who Xmas special

I just wish they would fess up and rename the show, "The Rose Show, featuring some Doctor guy". The 1st 40 minutes were tedius since Rose, Mickey, & Jackie are all weak characters that couldn't carry it. Overall it fit into the Doctor Who universe and stuff but it just wasn't very well done. Weak aliens, weak story, weak everything. Except for the Doc. He was fine and should be good if he can squeeze Rose's family members out of the way long enough to shine.

As for Earth having planetary defense. Well it's not the first time Earth was invaded and UNIT had to try and repel the invasion.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


KaosDevice said:
Hey UK'ers, is there any word on when this season of Doctor Who is coming out on DVD? It's a definite must buy for me. :D

Well, I'm not from the UK, but I can tell you that it will be released in the US as a single set on February 14th, the same day as it gets released in Canada. I think they're feeling out the US market, and expect it to sell to folks who've been downloading it anyways.
 

I honestly don't mind a lot of Rose. I've been watching much of the classic who for the first time recently, and I find I enjoy it the most when the companions are active participants in what is occuring.

I'm not terribly fond of Mickey and Jackie, so when I hear about production and something to the effect of "Mickey and Jackie will be showing up more this year!", it isn't really something I look forward to. Similarly, I like Earth stories, but venturing a bit farther out would be welcome.

That said, I think they worked well for a Christmas episode. Christmas specials would feel strange without some feeling of family, and we got to have more people than just Rose reacting to the Doctor's change.
 



Captain Tagon said:
If one was just looking to get into the whole Dr Who thing, what would be the best place to start?
Start with any doctor, mostly. The show has had the habit of reinventing itself a bit with each new regeneration. Now, of course, not all Doctors are created equal and the debate on who's the best Doctor rages on to this day, but Tom Baker's always been my favourite, followed by Peter Davidson. Colin Baker had a lot of good stories, but I find his Doctor lacking, while Silvester McCoy makes a good Doctor, but had crappy stories. I haven't seen any of the first three doctors material.

Of course, if you haven't seen the new series, start there.
 

Captain Tagon said:
If one was just looking to get into the whole Dr Who thing, what would be the best place to start?
As Viking Bastard has mentioned, the new series is probably a good place to start. The DVD releases of the old series are very sporadic. Some of the older episodes were destroyed by the BBC in the 70's. I still haven't seen the new series myself, but will definitely be picking it up when it is released in the US.
 

Viking Bastard said:
The whole series is already out.

Not in North America, though, which is what I think he really wanted to know. Different regions, and all that.


Captain Tagon said:
If one was just looking to get into the whole Dr Who thing, what would be the best place to start?

Viking Bastard is correct, there is no place you really MUST jump on. Each Doctor is different, depending on your preferences. Tom Baker, the fourth doctor, is the most famous and did it for the most number of episodes. Many folks (myself included) consider him the best doctor or one of the best. Each Doctor had a different emphasis and feel. The first Doctor, William Hartnell, was the grumpy grandfather: his stories emphasized history, and had little fantastic elemets. The second Doctor, Patrick Troughton, was more whimsical, like your crazy uncle...he was more of a clown...but faced more aliens and supernatural stuff. He introduced the Daleks and the Time Lords.

After him came Jon Pertwee, a younger and more active doctor...and COLOR! He episodes were flashier and more action packed. He also had a consistent earth-bound set of stories, with lots of aliens and the Master, the Doctor's arch-nemesis. Jon Pertwee was the flamboyant dandy. Tom Baker was the charming trickster and had some of the most iconic Doctor Who stories. He was followed by the youngest doctor, Peter Davidson, who had some excellent episodes. He was followed by Colin Baker, who was a fairly unpopular doctor, but had some excellent stories. He eventually found his legs as the character, but the writers tried to make him more disagreeable, and it backfired. He was followed by Sylvester McCoy, who was more like Patrick Troughton, a comedic character actor. He was a wonderful doctor with terrible stories (I mean, REALLY bad). After him there was a hiatus, then Fox made a Doctor Who movie for the US market as a potential series pilot staring the likable Paul McGann. However, the movie was generally very poorly received due to its poorly though out plot and nothing happened until last years new series. This heralded Christopher Ecclestone' Doctor, considered by many to be one of the best. He left at the end of last season, and this new episode was the debut of David Tennant, who has some serious potential, as well.

The trick here is that continuity is relatively relaxed and usually explained when necessary. Most episodes have a "who are you, doctor?" sequence that is good enough to get you moving along.
 
Last edited:

WizarDru has a nice summary of the various Doctors there in his last post, but I'd like to correct a couple of points: the Daleks were introduced in the William Harnell episodes, not the Patrick Troughton ones ("The Daleks" was the second group of connected episodes in Hartnell's first season), and that should be Peter Davidson as the Doctor between Tom Baker and Colin Baker (WizarDru plugged Colin Baker in twice in a row).

Johnathan
 

Remove ads

Top