"This not something real to be offended about". You said that. That is literal intolerance. You are denying them expression of thought. You are denying them expression of opinion. You are talking for them. Inserting your opinion as if it was objective. If you cannot work that out. There is no helping you. You want to continue to think like this. Fine. Good for you.What gives you the impression I'm against cultural consultants?
You do know OA had Japanese playtesters, not quite the same - and there were Asian persons involved in the 3.x book. But you know, these cultural consultants won't be full proof, how can they possibly be given everyone has a mic these days.
I'm saying I do not find the heftness in their justification for their offense and suggested they find something with heftness.
If one does not find the necessary justification for other's offense then surely it would stand to reason that said other's offense would lose all sense of gravitas.
Same as above. But please note it would be said opinion on this matter with said justification. Should those justifications change then one's opinion could be re-evaluated.
Either that or your favourite Wizard of Oz character is the Strawman.
IMO it is the latter, but you can say my voice does not matter.