Ok, so...
Scene: My PC's are fighting aboard the deck of an airship in the Eberron setting. The party's shifter Barbarian/Ranger (named Kraven), who wields a throwing axe and a longsword, gets hasted by the artificer, and then gets bumrushed by about 7 Emerald Claw troops, including 2 captains... He tries to do the following, and I ruled no (explanation follows)... Did I rule correctly or incorrectly?
Kraven declares he is taking a hasted two-weapon full attack (longsword +8 melee, hand-axe +6 melee, longsword +10 melee), then take a 5ft step out of a flank.
I ruled no, and here's why: I was under the impression that the 5ft step was a part of a full-round action, and needed to be taken before the hasted attack goes off, since it was a 'plus action' from an effect.
He's arguing that the extra attack is part of the full-round attack, and that I was in error. He didn't put up too much of a fuss at the time (I have my group well schooled to "go with the flow and argue later"), and just went with it. He makes a good argument, but I want to put it out there and make sure I didn't screw him over (he ended up going unconscious due to the flanked attack next round).
Help!
Scene: My PC's are fighting aboard the deck of an airship in the Eberron setting. The party's shifter Barbarian/Ranger (named Kraven), who wields a throwing axe and a longsword, gets hasted by the artificer, and then gets bumrushed by about 7 Emerald Claw troops, including 2 captains... He tries to do the following, and I ruled no (explanation follows)... Did I rule correctly or incorrectly?
Kraven declares he is taking a hasted two-weapon full attack (longsword +8 melee, hand-axe +6 melee, longsword +10 melee), then take a 5ft step out of a flank.
I ruled no, and here's why: I was under the impression that the 5ft step was a part of a full-round action, and needed to be taken before the hasted attack goes off, since it was a 'plus action' from an effect.
He's arguing that the extra attack is part of the full-round attack, and that I was in error. He didn't put up too much of a fuss at the time (I have my group well schooled to "go with the flow and argue later"), and just went with it. He makes a good argument, but I want to put it out there and make sure I didn't screw him over (he ended up going unconscious due to the flanked attack next round).
Help!
