I guess I did misunderstand your post because I know what fudging is, but that had nothing apparently to do with what you were talking about in the post I responded to. You said:
"...this would be a case of the system not aligning with the play agenda. You want game A, the system is delivering game B, but instead of looking for a game that does deliver A the system is ignored to produce the agenda. What's weird here is that the system isn't just ignored, but rather invoked to be ignored. I guess I don't grok the need to claim that you're using the system to the point of invoking it only if the plan is to ignore it."
Which I understood to be you saying you don't know why I would use a game B with a set system, when I'd rather have game A... and then ignore stuff in the game B system to produce the results of game A. To which my post answered that question quite well. I don't care about either system. I'll play whatever I have and whatever folks at my table want to play, and I'll create the game that I end up with.
If there's something else you are trying to get across you'll need to restate it, because the point you thought you were making didn't work.