IRON DM 2021 Tournament


I plan on living forever. Or die trying.
Interesting, your comments seemed to build the other way, that Worm competition was more playable and solid. I expected it to win.

log in or register to remove this ad

Wow, Cold Crown reads like it could be published. But both are amazing entries. It surprises me, given the tight word count and tricky ingredients, that both contestants are able to establish a whole setting and cast of characters.
Last edited:

Radiating Gnome

Interesting, your comments seemed to build the other way, that Worm competition was more playable and solid. I expected it to win.
I know. For long swathes of writing the response, that's where I thought it was going. I was literally on the fence the whole time, and had a version of the final result section that went the other way, too. These are both entries that should win.

Radiating Gnome

Wow, Cold Crown reads like it could be published. But both are amazing entries. It surprises me, given the tight word count and tricky ingredients, that both contestants are able to establish a whole setting and cast of characters.
Having been around both of these creators through these competitions for a long time, I can say It's no surprise at all. Wicht and El-remmen are of the old magic, the deep magic. Even when el-remmen was gnashing his teeth over the struggle to come up with an entry, I knew his would be strong in the end.
Last edited:

Snarf Zagyg

Notorious Liquefactionist
Two great entries.

....Slightly disappointed that el-Remmen didn't work in some Simpsons references given the title. Did I miss them?

Both adventures:
10/10 for adventures.
0/10 for 80s movies references.

Final tally:
Diplomacy's Cold Crown: 1999 Brosnans out of a fortnight of Calhamers
Don't Have a Cow, Man?: 419 Hemingways punchily reciting 140 Brannigans

Snarf Zagyg

Notorious Liquefactionist
Word count forced me to cut out all the Cool Runnings allusions. 1993, but there you are.

In fairness ... eighties, nineities, naugties, whatevers ... THEY ARE ALL THE BEFORE TIMES!


Iron Sky

Procedurally Generated
Judging Round 2 Match 1, Wicht vs. El-Remmen
Three passes: casual reader looking for cool bits, GM looking at running it, Iron Judge weighing ingredient use, interlinkage, and creativity.

Vaguely stream of consciousness, hopefully more coherent as more sleep procured.

First up: @Wicht with

Pass the first (hopefully fast skim for cool bits and readability):

Read the opening tagline a few times. Gigantic diplomacy and fast worms? Huh.

Extra commas in second sentence?

Phrasing here is slowing me down a bit. I get the "epic old times" feel you're going for, but lurching and rereading. I've totally done this before (more self-notes for next Iron DM).

The heroes are called by whom?

Daring deeds sound right up most PCs bailiwick; wise action though? A bit more dubious.

After stumbling a bit on the lead in, getting the giant cast with quirks, goals, and tidbits to bring them to life is awesome.

I'd rewrite "From the moment the PCs enter the Jarl’s Hall, they are surrounded by danger and intrigue" to "Danger and intrigue surround the PCs from the moment they enter the Jarl's Hall" since the next sentence describes the Hall not the danger and intrigue. Little bits like this slowing things down and driving re-reading.

White dragons basking in glacial sunlight is awesome.

Uncertain about DPs currently, but we'll see. Edit: giving a fixed number then no numbers for exactly how much each thing is worth is meh.

The princess using the PCs is great, as is PCs having to parse out each giant's motivations and faction.

Ice worm bobsleigh FTW. Sounds fun.

First skim through impressions: sounds like a great high-level adventure. Action, diplomacy, racing, back-room politicking, sabotage. Phrasing threw me here and there, but once I got the feel for it everything smoothed out. So far so good!

Pass the second (GMing this thing):
I have seven main personalities to track; would be helpful to have some sort of org chart with the relationships to get it all in one place. That they have distinct personalities, goals, and some personality traits is great. Amazing how a simple adjective can give so much leverage when grappling with how to run NPCs: "cunning wizard", "nefarious tribal elder", "flirtatious young princess" gives you a hint of bed to grow them from.

Still not sold on DPs, especially when given hard targets and no quantitative guidance on how to award them.

I really like that the GM is given something immediate to launch off with: the princess starts flirting with somebody. Really helpful since it gives both players and GMs an "in" to the court without either side having to wing something. That the princess isn't directly aligned towards or against the PCs ultimate goal is even better IMO.

When throwing these names around, it would be helpful to tag them with reminders. "Frostmage Isholter" "Crooked Hirokol" or the like to keep track. Especially when you say "Koltabl arranges for his worm... to be stolen": Koltabl Sr. or Jr.?

The events also give a nice mix of activities - any characters into the court politics and deal-making have plenty to do while the more action-oriented PCs (this is D&D so probably most everyone) can still aid the ultimate goal but still compete, break things, race, etc. Excellent balance.

Throwing in little incidents like the crown and Hirokol pushing them debtwards with easy credit spice things up and can throw in some variety if PCs are stalling and/or things are going too well.

The final FightRace seems epic and an sweet climax for the adventure.

I don't D&D anymore, but if I did I could run this.

Pass the third (ingredients):
Slippery Slope: the ice chutes for wormsleighing. Straight-up literal slippery slopes. Solid.

Morale Check: multi-use with Koltabl senior overcoming his fears plus taking down Hirokol (probably inter-related). Uncertain about this ingredient since there's to check (unless you mean estimation?) rather PCs making good cases and successful CHA rolls to change morale.

Limbless Beast: Frost worms. They are plural, but that the PCs have their own makes it stronger.

Heavy Crown: Interesting incident even if heavy on the incidental rather than central. Crowns of some sort (usually wreathes) were often given in ancient times as race prizes, so ties in a bit more than I originally thought.

Subpar Hero: Koltabl Sr., subpar both due to rival sabotage and his shame. He's less a hero than a champion which weakens it (heroes arguably about overcoming, not winning), but he is excellently subpar.

Vanished Behemoth: Koltabl Sr.'s self-stolen mount. Tied closely with Tomorrow's Match. Stolen more than vanished; a spell disappearing it might make it stronger, but still decent, especially since it's tied in with other ingredients so thoroughly.

Tomorrow’s Match: the final match when the above happens. Not terrible, but probably the weakest ingredient.

Summary: Another impressive entry in a tournament full of them. The neat ties between ingredients, NPCs, and character's objectives is among the best I've seen in an Iron DM entry even if a few ingredients themselves could be stronger.

The adventure promises all sorts of challenges mixed with plenty of open-endedness for players to navigate their own path through plus key events the DM can fall back on to keep things on the rails. That the PCs have other means to achieve diplomatic ends makes this one of the best diplomacy-based F20 adventures I've ever seen.

el-remmen, you've got your work cut out for you.

On to @el-remmen with

Pass the first (hopefully fast skim for cool bits and readability):
D&D 3e? Oddly specific and, nowadays, super niche. Edit: there's a reason.

Called out the heavy crown without saying why it's heavy.

"The rules for these combats are obscurant, reinforced as religious doctrine, and to be respected without compromise, lest the world fall back into chaos, and men are forced to fight their own wars." 5 commas? Also, obscurant is a new word for me. Cool.

More extraneous commas inserting themselves to chop up sentences.

Heavy crown again without why it's heavy.

Now a hyphen to weld another awkward sentence together.

Jumping to a description of the behemoth seems out of place here since we're just told it was vanished.

Limbless beast not capitalized, then capitalized. Here a description of it seems useful as to what it is, but we don't have one.

At this point the coolness of the kaiju city-state battles clicked with me. I have no idea yet what any of this has to do with the PCs (not a great thing this far through the adventure).

"Nations thrive while common people suffer." My favorite sentence so far summarizing how this works; paints the whole system with an epic, brutal brush. Imagining a continent full of city states like this who war with kaiju brawls instead of armies.

So, rebels split between city folk and country folk? Trying to figure out what the city folk's plan is since they're doomed.

Ah, the PCs are them. This is a cool campaign start: "You've overthrown and murdered Beastmaster Xovorax the Vile. His hot blood drips from your hands and splatters the Ivory Throne. As the palace guards flee, the cheers of the battered rebel remnant tatter to silence as the realization of the city's impending doom crushes down upon you. What do you do?"

Wanting to jump into ingredients here with the mechanical subparness but restraining myself.

Morale checks are awesome and tie nicely into the "Nations thrive while people suffer" bit: a ton of you are probably going to die, but if you live not only will your fields come back richer than ever, but here's a stimulus check to help get you going again. Cut off the stimmys, cut off any hope and good will of people being crushed by the system (no comment about any RL similarities).

The Sophie's Choice-nature of these options is also too real (hyperinflation vs deflationary collapse vs zombie economy anyone?) Anything they pick will result in somewhere between hardship to disaster with anything involving war and violence. This setting is about the most grim and brutal I've seen since Dark Sun.

That they have choices is helpful, even if they are pre-set. What if the PCs want to somehow unite the two city states into one then form cells to infiltrate all other city states to break this dystopic cycle or something else they come up with?

Pass the second (GMing this thing):
Here enters the big weakness of "choose one of these options" adventures: even with the disclaimer of "PCs are free to choose whatever course of action they deem best" that three options are then detailed will push most GMs towards one of the them.

If players channel into one, discard roughly two-thirds of the actual adventure you've just read and prepped. If they go their own way, now you're improvising. Having done this myself, another note to self for future competitions. If you've never judged and plan on playing again, I highly recommend slipping to this end of the contest to see everything in a different light.

This isn't any sort of put down on the options themselves: infiltrating and overthrowing a city, hijacking a wagon of runestone cash, or playing King of the Monsters with a tarrasque all sound great fun and any would provide an entertaining sub-adventure of its own.

#3 would be strengthened if the PCs were forced to pass the crown between them during the match; I think this may have been your intention but it's not clear. It also skews the adventure pretty highly for non-participants: you get to pilot Godzilla vs Manda while making save vs Death rolls while you get to herd peasants and maybe get crushed to death. Gritty and harsh, yes. Fun? Dunno.

Pass the third (ingredients):
Slippery Slope: the risks if the players take option 2; maybe things fall apart. That the slippery slope might not occur if the PCs take another option weakens this greatly even if the slippery slope itself is cool (and awful).

Morale Check: I love this ingredient for reasons given above. That said, it also suffers from the same big weakness of this adventure (choice-dependent content irrelevance).

Limbless Beast: The amputated rival kaiju. A huge threat looming over the entire adventure yet also an ally they could flip. Strong.

Heavy Crown: A crown heavy in reality and also crushing in what they must do with it. Also strong and cool (and terrible). And might be skipped; see big weakness.

Subpar Hero: The players. Subpar mechanically to make them actual commoners (the election of 3e makes sense now) yet they must try to save their city in spite of their frailty. Pretty cool.

Vanished Behemoth: Their Kaiju, to be summoned by the Heavy Crown. That the PCs could actually run it makes it better. That it's gone and all that's protecting them from the Limbless Beast better still.

Tomorrow’s Match: An inexorable pressure cooker of inevitable death and destruction lurking just over the horizon. Literally since it comes with the new day. Excellent use, best I could have hoped for with this ingredient.

When watching Netflix or Prime with my wife, the highest praise I can give a move or show is "this makes me want to write." She sighs and goes to bed while I stay up until 2am scribbling down ideas, arcs, characters, and situations.

This setting is terrible in all the best ways. Life is cheap, overlords sacrifice the best-and-brightest to giant monsters keep the other monsters at bay, and the PCs best hope is to choose a path of destruction that might leave them alive atop the smoking rubble heap piled at the end. Though initially pretty skeptical due to grammars, this one grew on me, sparked my imagination, and makes me want to write.

Diplomacy's Cold Crown is fantastic in both setting, premise, and execution. Giant politics, backstabbing, games, treachery, and action wrapped into a neat package. Ingredients are well used, well united, and generally integral and immutable. A few ingredients seem a bit weak or tertiary, the DP mechanic is unclear, but the whole ties together in a way some professionally published adventures might envy.

Don't Have a Cow, Man? rocks one of my favorite settings I've seen in an entry: a bleak world of sacrifice, war, and worship ruled by fickle gods and tyrannical beast masters. The ingredients individually are clever, spot-on thematically, and connect together in a web with few weak threads.

If I had to choose whether to run a game set in glacial giant land or a war-ravaged monster-haunt, I'd almost certainly choose the latter. Princess Mononoke meets Dark Sun plus Godzilla vs High Level D&D with level-appropriate foes. Not a dis on Wicht's A-grade adventure, just a recognition of how evocative, creative, and compelling I find the world el-remmen threw me into for the hour I spent brooding through it.

This tournament, however, isn't about the setting I like most. It's about writing badass adventures.

Both of these qualify, but where Diplomacy's Cold Crown throws the PCs into an obstacle course packed clearly delineated opponents, potentially allies, key events, and options on how they want proceed towards the end goal while Don't Have a Cow, Man? drops PCs into a battlefield where PCs must do whatever it takes to survive, but their course will probably be one of the main exits the GM has prepped.

Almost every element of Diplomacy's Cold Crown is relevant and the PCs will interact with it directly, which can't be said of its opposition with any two of three ingredients left behind depending on pathing. Ultimately, this efficiency of content creation, presentation, and usage catapults Diplomacy's Cold Crown past Don't Have A Cow, Man? while the latter is busy ladling generous, evocative portions of potentially irrelevant action onto the GM's plate.

All that said, it was a pleasure to read and judge both these entries. I nominate both for the Iron DM anthology, but am only able to nominate one of you for advancement to the finals.

That one is Wicht.

Iron Sky

Procedurally Generated
Just read Radiating Gnome's judgment. Looks like we're 1-1 so this one could go either way (which makes sense considering how good both are). Looking forward to seeing who moves on!


Once A Fool
Still have at least one more pass at reading/note-taking to go before I begin writing my R2M1 judgement. If mine is the deciding vote, hang in there, folk.

If not, well, it’s coming down the line, anyway.


Moderator Emeritus
Honestly, given my woes writing my entry and its obvious weaknesses, and despite my coming around to actually quite liking it, once I read Wicht's entry, I was like, "If I get at least one judgement in my favor against that I will be satisfied." Having gotten that one judgement and reading how close it was for Iron Sky (who has a weird obsession with commas), I am satisfied. I would still like to win, of course but Wicht's entry really is fantastic and seems hecka fun."
Last edited:


Once A Fool
Judgement for Round 2, Match 1: Wicht vs el-remmen

These are both big adventures. And not just because of the giants and behemoths. The scope of both of these adventures is very ambitious. Moreso in el-remmen’s “Don’t Have a Cow, Man?” (“Cow”) than in Wicht’s Diplomacy’s Cold Crown (“Crown”). As one would expect from a mini-campaign, I suppose. Even so, there is at least as much going on in “Crown”, despite it’s adventure-scale format.

Big Adventure, Small Campaign

But what, exactly, does “Cow” mean by calling itself a mini-campaign, anyway? As things stand at the start, the time-pressure is already on; if the players don’t change things within the next day, consequences will be dire. Perhaps this is meant to act as the seed to a campaign that will play out based on the consequences of the PCs choices? Perhaps it is but an adventure within a setting meant to be a campaign? Like I said: ambitious.

As is my wont, I’m going to start with hooks and stakes, but these are tied in so tightly with their adventures that I’m going to need to look at each independently.

First, “Cow”. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a campaign begin in medias res. This is an interesting approach, as it immediately puts the PCs into the midst of the social conflict that is the framework for this campaign. This is good. The lack of context that this creates can easily be filled in and all is well.

The stakes of the conflict are also tied in with that introduction, although the PCs aren’t likely to know it immediately. So far, good.

The entry is set up to be very open in allowing the PCs to follow their own goals and approaches to achieving them, despite the preordained origin of their involvement in events. This is also good.

And the setting itself is so very rich. The caste-struggles that define it are manifest not only throughout the background, but also in the very systems of control that the PCs will interact with. All very good stuff.

But about that background…

A significant chunk of this entry is devoted to explaining it. And the players are going to have to know all of it to really get a sense of things. Or, at the very least, every time they want to do something that the elitist’s elitist gods have arbitrarily decreed is against the rules, someone is going to have to appear to inform them why they can’t or (shouldn’t). That is a potential speed-bump. Or, more likely, a series of them.

That’s a challenge, but it’s not insurmountable. What might be insurmountable would be the part that happens first: getting players to buy into a whole campaign played with underwhelming characters. It looks like it would be a great experience to my DM-eyes, but I sure don’t know how I’d sell it.

Big Adventure, Small Ripples

”Crown” gives us a pretty specific hook, too, but the trappings are generic enough to work with pretty much any setting that hasn’t deliberately been designed to avoid fantasy tropes.

Once inside the adventure, we get a dense web of NPCs and factions that form an interconnected series of complications and relationships. The PCs are turned loose into this precarious dynamic and must navigate various NPC shenanigans while furthering their own goals in whatever ways they see fit.

The stakes are clear right from the hook: war, peace, or something in between. The mechanics for achieving those stakes are clean, although it might help to have some guidance on how many diplomacy points could potentially be earned (or lost) per NPC and/or faction.

What really makes the structure of this adventure stand out, though, is the intricacy with which the PCs developing relationships and actions will affect all of the others. It’s complex, but cleanly presented.

I do wonder one thing, however. If Isholter enters the race on the last day, surely it’s evident to everybody that he can’t get enough points to win. It should be obvious he has an ulterior motive. Are the spectators hoping to see a fight, or what?


Slippery Slope is a tricky one. It has the potential to be an interesting thematic ingredient, or, most likely, an action set-piece.

We definitely get the set-piece in “Crown”. It certainly makes sense within the context of the adventure and it also certainly looks fun.

“Cow” provides us a slippery slope in the broadest sense: the actions of the PCs will lead to bad consequences. I suppose this could be part of a theme, but it’s certainly not the theme of moral argument that the ingredient would suggest, because the actual choice doesn’t matter much. They all lead to bad things happening (although, option 3 actually does presumably lead to future moral degradation).

But it’s not quite nihilism, either, because it isn’t necessarily entirely bad? I don’t know. Maybe the theme is: Everything sucks when the gods are active — and suck.

If we didn’t have anything else, I think this would be better than the slope in “Crown”.

But “Crown” has more to give us here. It provides us at least one moral slope for the PCs to slip down in the form of betting (and their potential to influence related events after). In addition, in the more general sense, the interconnectedness of each of the NPCs and complications in this adventure are such that the entire structure is a series of PCs’ decisions that will necessarily influence each of their future ones. When your ingredient provides the framework for the entire adventure, you know you’ve nailed it.

After that, things swing toward “Cow” a little bit. “Crown” has a couple of Morale Checks that come in the form of potential outcomes to the PCs’ relationship with Koltabl and with the court. Both depend on removing Hirokol’s influence over his debtors. It’s a good element in the adventure, but I’m not sure it fits the ingredient entirely well, especially the “check” part, since it seems automatic if conditions are met.

Meanwhile, “Cow” gives us some runestones that serve as checks in the sense that they are redeemable for money, and also in that the PCs can target them to check the morale of their recipients (as in stop it from spreading) by stealing them. What really works here is that this particular ingredient says a lot about the social structure of the setting simply by existing as a system of control. The ruling class uses these “rewards” as a means of making the oppressed accept and even desire the oppression. It’s disturbing, but entirely believable. It’s also kind of fun that this option is a perversion of the Robin Hood thing: Steal from the poor to stick it to the rich.

The Limbless Beasts of “Crown” work within the adventure slightly better than in “Cow”(in that they fit the context very well and also have a mechanical synergy with the frost giants (who are immune to cold) that the PCs probably won’t have.

The gods-punished dragon works, too (and it’s nice to see the possibility of wrecking things by healing its wings). I do wonder if this dragon is also a manifestation of the favor of the gods (like the aurochs) and, if so, could it likewise be vanished?

At any rate, the fact that this ingredient is singular counts for something. In the end, I find both entries about even on this one.

“Crown” is less impressive with it’s Heavy Crown. It’s role is as a Macguffin within the adventure, which inherently means it could take any form. It’s role plays a big part in complicating the PCs’ lives, to be sure (especially if it happens before the worm goes missing), but it could be anything. As an aside, why is it fiery? Is it meant to be uncomfortable for frost giants? That’s an extra kind of heaviness, I suppose.

“Cow” has a heavy crown that actually makes the PCs using it fatigued (especially given how weak they are). It actually matters that it is a crown (since it controls the kaiju). It is strongly connected to the morally-degrading slippery-slope path and the practical consequences of the PCs being subpar heroes. This is superior.

Speaking of Subpar Hero, “Cow” sets this up before the adventure even begins. Dodging the potential buy-in difficulties I mentioned earlier, this is a very clever way to make sure the ingredient is always relevant.

“Crown” has a champion who is not a hero, but definitely does (intentionally) perform below expectations. He’s a very good character and an excellent portion of the adventure, but he’s not that great as an ingredient. But he is singular, so that counts for something.

The Vanished Behemoth that is Koltabl’s frost worm in “Crown” is a good implementation, however. The tie-ins with the other complications are delicious (the stolen crown and the PCs’ potential bets against Kiltabl, in particular).

But this is only a part of the adventure, and “Cow” managed to make the absence of it’s behemoth loom over the entirety — even to the point of embodying the stakes of the scenario.

And the same is true of Tomorrow’s Match. The time-pressure is important to both entries, but it’s establishment at the very start of “Cow” makes it more integral to the whole. As with the vanished behemoth, it is ever-present.

Ironically, the strength of this ingredient might be a structural weakness for the adventure/campaign; a single day just doesn’t seem like enough time to do all of the things that this scenario promises. Be that as it may, however, it is a strong ingredient.

So, that’s one excellently used ingredient in “Crown” over a good one in “Cow”, one tie between two pretty good ingredient usages, and five very good ingredients in “Cow” over four slightly-less-very good ingredients in “Crown”. And one that is replaceable.

I really hope I’m not the tie-breaker

I thought I knew which way this was going when I started writing.

Wicht’s entry is extraordinary. The adventure is elegant and, frankly, essentially flawless. The ingredients are, on the whole, strong. And one of them exemplifies everything I look for in an IRON DM ingredient’s implementation.

But el-remmen’s entry is also very strong. The adventure/campaign is not flawless, but is still very good and the slight edges on those ingredients really add up.

Do they add up enough? I guess I have to figure out how much better the adventure in “Crown” is vs. how much better the ingredients are in “Cow”.

…I’ve done some soul-searching and I’m going to have to side with excellence. “Cow” never fails to be good, but I don’t think it’s numerous slightly-better ingredients outweigh the excellence of the adventure presented in “Crown”, given that only one of its ingredients is actually not very good and another one is exceptionally excellent.

This is a tough call. Part of me really hopes I’m the minority vote. But my vote is for Wicht in this one.

…Alas, I am not fated to vote in irrelevance. @el-remmen, no one knows better than you what this is all about and your skills do not disappoint. I’d be equally happy to see further entries from you or to see you get back into the judge’s saddle again. It has been a pleasure.

For now, however, @Wicht advances to the championship round!


LOL. (literally)
I don't think that I have ever seen a round where two out of the three judges are so conflicted. RG votes for El-remmen's entry but voices a desire to be in the minority. Rune votes for mine but also voices a desire to be in the minority. I am glad the contest was that close. Even though Nemm had trouble with his, he did pretty well, I would say.

I am not sure I have ever seen another entry do quite as well on selling itself on pure world-building as "Cow." It made me think of The Reckoner series (norms vs. evil supes) and Attack on Titan both, and as Iron Sky said, while the adventure itself was admittedly a bit weak, the setting and set-up makes one want to write. I totally get that and agree. I wouldn't mind seeing an actual campaign in a world like that and I suspect if the adventure had been a bit more linear actually, mine wouldn't have won.

When I said these ingredients were deceptively simple, I was being serious. They all were kind of obvious, but not necessarily in a way that was easy to make the ingredients integral to the adventure. Why a limbless beast? Why a crown. A helm or a throne might work just as well in most cases. A vanished behemoth likewise is hard to incorporate as integral because its likely not actually there, and thus becomes a macguffin, which in most cases is pretty replaceable. So they were a challenge to try and work in together in a way that held together and where they could not be replaced with something else. And then the 1500 word limit made it even more tricky, naturally.

As far as the values of the DPs, for each thing, I simply did not have room to include them though I was thinking minor events would probably be 1 or 2 and more major events 4 or 5. Winning the whole race, without killing the jarls wizard, might have been 8. This is also the reason that I did not put titles before each name, such as Frost-wizard Isholter. My original draft did that and I simply ran out of words before I could include everything I wanted including the final fight and the bit with the crown. Going back to the DPs, I kept the point notation in because it conveyed the idea that the final outcome could fall somewhere on a scale of good to bad, which I thought was a good idea.

I don't disagree with much of the ingredient discussion, but I will say that I had a second use of heavy crown that might have got overlooked, and that was the responsibility of the Jarl to lead his people well, even when his people might not all want those things that would end up being for their good. It was subtle, but I was sorta hoping it would get more notice to make up for some of the weakness with the other. As for the fiery crown with frost giants, the fire of a flaming weapon does not harm the bearer, and I thought a big old stone crown you could hurl at your enemies would be the sort of traveling trophy that frost giants might like for their tournaments.

Also, I agree with RG that the kidnapping plot was a foolish sort of ploy, that could have been done better, but that was actually intended, as the champion was not supposed to necessarily be the brightest of giants.

Also, also, it struck me this afternoon that plot wise it would work pretty well to have the champions son be a second sub-par hero, by giving him an opportunity to take his father's place and win some glory in the games for the Jarl and for the hand of his princess. If I was going to develop the scenario further, I would probably play with that aspect a bit.
Last edited:


Once A Fool
I don't generally disagree with much of the ingredient discussion, but I will say that I had a second use of heavy crown that might have got overlooked, and that was the responsibility of the Jarl to lead his people well, even when his people might not all want those things that would end up being for their good. It was subtle, but I was sorta hoping it would get more notice to make up for some of the weakness with the other.
That would have been better. Unfortunately, its subtlety could not compete with the distraction of the Macguffin.

Level Up!

An Advertisement