Grimstaff
Explorer
Wolfspider said:I don't want to try sky-diving, which would be a new experience for me.
Am I irrational?
Clearly.
Wolfspider said:I don't want to try sky-diving, which would be a new experience for me.
Am I irrational?
I probably like 4e a lot more than your friend does, but i have no intention on switching or playing it upon release. I read a ton of great systems as a reviewer for rpgnow, but the hassle of converting is much more important to me than the enjoyment of playing with some new toys.Wolfspider said:I don't want to try sky-diving, which would be a new experience for me.
Am I irrational?
Wolfspider said:I don't want to try sky-diving, which would be a new experience for me.
Am I irrational?
"Trying something new" like sampling a new cuisine or a new movie is one thing. But trying something new can mean abandoning something cherished, and in that case you have to think long and hard about what you're giving up. Whether it's moving to a new city, ending a relationship, leaving a job, or quitting a hobby. WotC has decided to abandon 3.5 in favor of 4E. The decision doesn't have to be as drastic for players -- I could try 4E without quitting 3.5 -- but even by participating in 4E I would feel I was endorsing WotC's decisions and business model. And as a fan of 3.5 I really resent what WotC did.BradfordFerguson said:Unwillingness to simply try something new is irrational to me. The rational thing for me as a person is to experience new things and grow as a person.
Brother MacLaren said:"Trying something new" like sampling a new cuisine or a new movie is one thing. But trying something new can mean abandoning something cherished, and in that case you have to think long and hard about what you're giving up. Whether it's moving to a new city, ending a relationship, leaving a job, or quitting a hobby. WotC has decided to abandon 3.5 in favor of 4E. The decision doesn't have to be as drastic for players -- I could try 4E without quitting 3.5 -- but even by participating in 4E I would feel I was endorsing WotC's decisions and business model. And as a fan of 3.5 I really resent what WotC did.
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." But WotC deliberately broke 3.5, accelerated splatbook power creep, introduced new and incompatible mechanics as a test for 4E. They were planning to kill off 3.5 for YEARS. And of course they're going to do this again, because splatbooks and new editions make more money than campaign settings and modules. So why should I bother falling in love with 4E when I know WotC is just going to kill it? I'm hopping off the edition treadmill for good.
There are simply too many games out there for my standard of switching systems to be "I like System X, but System Y might be more fun." With that mentality, I'd never be content with what I have, and I'd have to try hundreds of games for a couple of dozen sessions each to see if System Y really was better. Instead, my standard for switching is "I am no longer enjoying System X." And I already have two systems that I really like, so why should I look for more?
Thing is there are a ton of systems out here that are faster than 3.5 (though fun is a subjective term). Any rule that they have in 4e can probably be converted into 3.5 (and will). This will give me the chance to make and move.BradfordFerguson said:WolfSpider, I'll give you the skydiving exemption. 4e and skydiving. They are both taking a plunge, but I think the similarities end there, but since you're clever I bet you can think of more
As far as converting, I just don't see the resistance there. Let's presume that 4e will be MUCH better than 3.5, more fun to play, faster combat, etc... Are people SO attached to their characters being an exact certain way that they can't simply do a simple conversion? Instead of trying to convert it exactly?
Because playing D&D isn't just about playing D&D, its about hanging out with friends. And following the OP's scenario, your friends all want to play 4e, and are willing to loan you, or even provide you, with the materials to play. All you have to do is show up and hang out with your friends. There is no expense on your part, no pain, no agony, no nothing. You COULD boycott your own friends over this, or proclaim that anyone who expects you to play 4e is no friend of yours, or whatever. You COULD try to convince yourself that playing 4e will be so painful to you that anyone who figures you'd do it just to hang out with your buds is a jerk. Or you could just shrug, and chill with your friends on Saturday night like you always do.Brother MacLaren said:And I already have two systems that I really like, so why should I look for more?
Yes, but it's why we love youWolfspider said:I don't want to try sky-diving, which would be a new experience for me.
Am I irrational?
BradfordFerguson said:WolfSpider, I'll give you the skydiving exemption. 4e and skydiving. They are both taking a plunge, but I think the similarities end there, but since you're clever I bet you can think of more
As far as converting, I just don't see the resistance there. Let's presume that 4e will be MUCH better than 3.5, more fun to play, faster combat, etc... Are people SO attached to their characters being an exact certain way that they can't simply do a simple conversion? Instead of trying to convert it exactly?
I don't believe there will be any more gamers playing 3.5 in June of '09 than there are playing 2E or any other older edition of the game.