KesselZero
First Post
The name hin is used in the 3.e forgotten realms campaign book pg. 17 if it helps.
Thanks! Never owned that book.
The name hin is used in the 3.e forgotten realms campaign book pg. 17 if it helps.
This poll is very poorly thought out.
But to answer the question, I do not care. Put a halfling in the books and let the player describe them. Why dictate?
Cannibals. Or maybe dinosaur riding nomads...
Honestly, who cares what the "official" halfling is like? Define what it'll be for your game, done.
Nobody's game exists in a vacuum, players come in with expectations based upon their experiences. A halfling from the 3e PHB is an athletic creature that gains bonuses to climbing and jumping. When you make changes to what is in the core books there is often resistance from some players, if it's in the PHB they'll be more accepting.
If my DM says his halflings are plump gardeners running around with bare hairy feet, I won't say, "but on page 17 of the PHB, it says they are skinny and athletic riverfolk wearing boots." Wait... actually, I *would* say that, and get a good laugh out of everyone in the room.
The DM is the one creating the campaign world. If a player is going to go about not accepting the DM's world, that right there, is not going to make for a good game. On the other hand, if a player wants to play a skinny athletic halfling, it would be wise for a DM to come up with maybe a micro culture of halflings in another pocket of the world, who are like that. At the end of the day it's the DM and players who co-create the game experience. Again, I see no reason to care, what the PHB says. Whatever suits the game designers is fine by me.