"It's not exactly rape."It is not exactly rape because the women are not forced to have sex involuntarily with someone.
When you have to put qualifiers on a statement like that, it should be a big freaking warning sign.
"It's not exactly rape."It is not exactly rape because the women are not forced to have sex involuntarily with someone.
Unless they're choosing to be chaste, which would imply that it's a choice, and choices usually imply freedom. That's just the basic Law of Syllogism at work.
Well, I'm sure there will be many handsome knights in the order; there is bound to be at least one knight that catches a woman's eye.
And if you enjoy it, it's not rape.
A woman being attracted to her rapist does not make rape not rape.
Enjoying it does not make rape not rape.
Consenting makes it not rape.
A chaste woman is not sexually free but rather sexually suppressed.
If people are not allowed to be athiest, do they still have religious freedom?
And, how do you justify arguing that chastity is unnatural, but also provide birth control and abortions for the natural results from having sex?
If the society mandates chastity then yes. If she lives in a free society and remains chaste by choice then no.
Consenting makes it not rape.
Let's agree to disagree.