Krug said:So is there another term? It'll deceive the casual reader. Peasants? Citizens?
"1500 beggars?
is that correct? that's more than 10% of the population begging! you couldn't take a walk without bumping into at least ten of them! "
Conaill said:Joe, in your research to come up with these incidence rates, what kind of range did you find for the "beggar" category? If 1000 "beggars" seems to much for people, would 500 be plausible for a city of this size?
AH! So a "frontier" town which has much less of a "countryside" around it might have a lot less immigration, and thus many fewer beggars? I like *that* explanation a lot better.
Mind you, if we have very little immigration, that implies that the city itself has a positive growth rate, which I believe is unusual for a medieval city, right?
Lalato said:How about this... immigrants must work in the service of the city for 2 years before they can do something else. Once they've completed their obligation, immigrants can take up whatever work they want. That two year service period includes working the fields, doing construction projects, and other "unskilled" labor. The people that live in The Squats are basically this immigrant workforce. Those that refuse to give 2 years of service are more than welcome to live outside the city walls... near the swamp. --sam
Sounds interesting. One thing to try and remember however is that in a medievalesque world, authority doesn't come from a single source. The concept of "in the service to the city" would have to be extended to include in the service of the guilds, city council, lords... whatever are the powercenters. Even getting the power centers to agree on a two year period would be a major coup. Something like you suggest could be worked up, but to misquote myself, "As in all things magical medieval, complexity is almost perversly preffered."