My Time-Warner Cable Rant (v.1.0.1)

Aeolius

Adventurer
I’ve had issues with slow internet speed and bad cable TV reception for some time. Six weeks ago, I called Time-Warner about it.

They sent Cable Dude #1 out, who informed me that I needed two Flex cables buried instead of the one I currently had, so that I could have a dedicated line for TV and another for internet. He put in a work order for the cables to be buried. After a few days I called TW, who was unable to find any such work order, so they sent out Cable Dude #2, who had to start from scratch. He put a few “boosters” on the coax jacks that had cable boxes on them, which didn’t improve anything at all. Again, the call was made to bury cables.

After a few days I called TW, who was unable to find any such work order, so they sent out Cable Dude #3, who had to start from scratch (sensing a pattern, here?). He said my Flex should be fine, as it was roughly 400 feet from the pole to the house, but the junction on the utility pole should be checked. He put in a work order for that, and rescheduled burying the two Flex cables, just in case.

After a few days I called TW, who was unable to find any such work order, so they sent out Cable Dude #4, who ran a temporary cable on the ground, to test the signal. He put in a work order to bury two Flex cables.

I was beginning to think that all of those calls I had placed, protesting the proposed consumption-based billing model, had blacklisted me in TW’s database. For the record, though consumption-based billing was abandoned due to customer dissatisfaction, I blew through their their proposed “Pro” tier of 50 GB/month in under four days.

Days later, out comes Cable Dude #5, who was to bury the cable. A pity that he wasn’t told to bring Flex cable, so he left. After a few days I called TW, who assured me that Cable Dudes #6 and #7 would arrive in a few days, to bury the cables.

A few rainy days later, Cable Dudes #6 and #7 buried two Flex cables, inadvertently cutting through the temporary cable that Cable Dude #4 had laid. Of course it was not their job to hook up the cable, only to bury it, so they put in a call to have a technician come out and fix the cable that same day, as the regular technician was coming the next day to hook up the new Flex cables.

At 6:10pm (they close at 6pm) I called TW to ask where the technician was. I called four times, speaking with countless operators, before a technician was dispatched. Cable Dude #8 came out at 10pm, to fix the temporary cable.

The next day, Cable Dude #8 returned, to hook up the two Flex cables. Three different supervisors showed up that day, to insure the work had been completed.

The following day, having noticed no improvement in my internet speed or TV reception, I examined the closet where the cable feeders run from the side of the house to the interior. There are two Flex cables running to the house, now. The house has four Feeder cables running from the cable box on the side of the house to the “media closet” inside the house. Each Flex cable should have been connected to an independent Feeder cable, one for internet, one for television. Alas, one feeder cable was hooked to a splitter, split between the cable modem and a powered 8-way coax amplifier. The remaining 3 Feeder cables, (inputs, two of which are unused) were hooked into the powered 8-way amplifier outputs with 2-way and 3-way splitters. Ouch.

I noticed a marked improvement in internet speed, however, when I plugged a laptop directly into the cable modem. I got a much slower speed through the Airport WiFi. A bit of experimenting, involving moving my Mac Pro physically to five or six different locations, revealed that I had placed the desktop Macs in the one “dead zone” in my house; presumably blocked by interference from nearby HVAC ductwork. By moving my Mac Pro two feet to the left, I improved my internet speed threefold.

On my own initiative, I ordered a 1x16 powered bi-directional coax amplifier. Now I have to find the time to connect one feeder cable to the cable modem and the other to the new amplifier. Granted, none of the cables are labeled, so I’ll have to test each one, to see which room it goes to.

Thanks loads, Time-Warner. During the past six weeks, spurred by a recent 20% rate hike by TW, I looked at a few alternatives; DirecTV for television and Clearwire for internet. Verizon FIOS and AT&T U-Verse are not available in my area (just outside of Greensboro, NC) and the local DSL is too slow. One problem is that Clearwire only gives me 2 out of 5 bars of signal, though they said a new tower going up next month should fix that. Another problem is that DirecTV does not support standalone TiVo units and my wife likes her TiVo. DirecTV has been attempting to get back together with TiVo for some time, now, but there is no timetable set in stone. I'm sure by the time they work out a deal, Apple would have purchased TiVo.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Wow. What a story! Hopefully none of the cable dudes act like the Cable Guy.

I am glad you got something working, eventually anyway.

I used to work phones for DSL and dial-up support. It was no picnic, let me tell you. On-site technicians frequently blamed the DSL bridge, while the phone team and I frequently looked other places.
 

I have to be honest, I didn't read your whole post - but your subject line inspired me to share my own Time-Warner story. Well, to share the subject line of it, anyway: I hate Time-Warner!!!!!!!!!

I can't relive all the misery by detailing it.
 


Usually it's Comcast or Time Warner, I would say almost never both-- lovely competition eh?

The main problem I think is that both companies use indpendant contractors to do the hands-on work. Sure, the van says Comcast, but it's just some guy who got a sweet sub-contractor deal. He gets paid for the trip, even he if doesn't do anything. Now, I know that there are some good people out there who do their job, and do it well; however, I know that there are some not-so-good folks also... human nature and all that.

Case in point: When we bought our house (8 years ago now--ack), the previous owner had her Cable turned off. When we moved in, it was still connected. Now being the decent person I am, I called Comcast to have it turned off -- I didn;t want to accidentally get charged for services (yeah, I know). After it was "disconnected", I checked to make sure. Nope, still on. It took 3-4 calls (at my wifes request at this point, I was happy with free cable) before a tech actually came out and did the physical disconnect.

It's no wonder we have to pay so much (enough for them to buy NBC?).

/end Rant/

If my wife wasn;t addicted to the Food Network, I'd be ready to go back to the antenna days (we've got DSL for internet).
 

Holy hell.

I have to say that I've been very pleasantly surprised (not to mention shocked) that my interactions with our DSL provider (AT&T) and TV (DirecTV) have been, on the whole, excellent. I can't always say the same about the equipment itself but the service has been good, especially from DirecTV. I think I've been lucky to get a competent operator each time I called about a DSL issue.

If I can ever help it I will never use cable. Too many horror stories.
 

I have Comcast here in Chicago for tv, and they're no better. I'm so glad our building switched to a small ISP. I now get ridiculous speeds (OnShore gives 50+mbps for $25/month), without the "Comcastic" level of service. Still have to deal with them for tv though, sigh.
 

I'm surprised some people have choices. Cable companies all seem to be monopolies that have divided up the country for their own. Where I live (RI), Cox is the only provider for most of the state, except for the eastern part that hangs off of MA. They seem ot have Full Channel and no other choice. Up north in MA, I think they have Comcast. I'm not aware of anywhere near me that actually has a choice of 2+ cable providers.
 

While the customer service aspect is unforgivable, if it's possible for you to download that much, you're averaging upwards of 140kB (over a megabit) a second assuming your computer is on 24/7 and the "under" in "under 4 days" isn't significant. That seems pretty respectable to me, so I'm not sure by what standards this represents problematically slow service. I certainly can get more than that for short periods but only in off-peak hours and even then, it depends on a lot of things that are outside my control, especially if there's any kind of P2P thing involved.

(Of course, I can't recommend AT&T in my own current situation - my service with them has been down for eight of the last nine days and slow and flaky for the other. My ability to post this message is due to one nice perk of theirs - free wireless at Starbucks - but I shouldn't have to resort to that to get a connection.)
 


Remove ads

Top