R_J_K75
Legend
Yeah I think thats a reasonable assumption.so just more subclasses to fill in the gaps then?
Yeah I think thats a reasonable assumption.so just more subclasses to fill in the gaps then?
I am Pink!Wait ....
WHICH ONE OF YOU IS PINK?
![]()
true the basic writing out of the oaths help greatly in dm player disputes.Anything would be better than the brown-paper-bag-generic, anything-goes, "fighter who went to church once" model that they have in the Player's Handbook. If they want to keep that model, that's fine...just make them a subclass of Fighter already and be done with it.
(I was being sarcastic about the alignment thing, in case you were wondering. I think alignment is the least of my issues with the paladin.)
a fair bet.Whoa, that was detailed!
Didn't they have similar survey about the PHB races a while ago? It seems pretty certain to me that they're working on some sort of PHB update.
humans are mostly red with bits of white and off white.I am Pink!
please a decent mystic, please a psion.It is interesting. Could be though they are about to do new classes and want to get another swag at what people like and think about what is out there.
What new classes could there be?
Doing (a) Gods work.In every comment box, I typed a short essay on the importance of alignment restrictions on Paladins. Even for non-paladin questions.
You're welcome.
This is a good survey but makes me think they may be considering some PHB Errata or PHB 5.5.
You've clearly never seen a bard played well. I have. They're useful, versatile, and a tremendous amount of fun.I know. Bards take so long to create, and with such little result. They are empty spaces disguised as etchings on a character sheet.