D&D General Nolzur creates inclusive miniatures, people can't handle it.


log in or register to remove this ad





Not sure what there is to disagree about. These folks decided to mock inclusion. How is that NOT being anti-inclusionary?
I was under the impression that your "in general? no" was shorthand for "in general, verisimilitude-based objections to magic wheelchairs are not presumed to be a pretext for hateful and anti-inclusive behavior." If that's not what you meant, then nevermind.
 

Wheels are terrible on anything but flat, even terrain. Rubble, stairs, a rope bridge, a steep slope, etc- adventure sites often involve terrain that makes a wheel chair seem pretty useless.
And giants wouldn’t be able to support their own body weight. We excuse all kinds of unrealistic things in the name of fantasy, it’s worth critically examining why this particular unrealistic thing is a sticking point.
 


I was under the impression that your "in general" was shorthand for "in general, verisimilitude-based objections to magic wheelchairs are not presumed to be a pretext for hateful and anti-inclusive behavior." If that's not what you meant, then nevermind.
Verisimilitude-based objections to magic wheelchairs aren’t necessarily a pretext for active anti-disabled sentiment. But, as per my post above, it’s worth critically examining why this specific thing is a verisimilitude problem when so many other physically impossible things in fantasy aren’t. We all have unconscious biases, it’s just a healthy practice to interrogate them in ourselves.
 

Verisimilitude-based objections to magic wheelchairs aren’t necessarily a pretext for active anti-disabled sentiment.
In my experience, most people don't seem to examine that possibility.
But, as per my post above, it’s worth critically examining why this specific thing is a verisimilitude problem when so many other physically impossible things in fantasy aren’t. We all have unconscious biases, it’s just a healthy practice to interrogate them in ourselves.
I agree with the general spirit of what you're saying here, but I think that hits closer to home than you realize, insofar as there seems to be some assumptions being made with the nature of objections with regard to verisimilitude.
 

Remove ads

Top