Baronovan said:Wow, I love a discussion thread where no one likes hearing opinions that differ from their own.
People usually do not mind hearing differing onipions, however wrong they may be

Baronovan said:Wow, I love a discussion thread where no one likes hearing opinions that differ from their own.
Phaedrus said:I like the skill points idea. 2 points on every odd level? Is that too much?
At 1st level the Fighter must choose a "profession" or "flavor focus" and from that select a number (4 or so) of skills that belong to that profession. Thereafter, at every odd level of fighter they get 2 skill points to spend on their profession's skills. Note that cross-class skills remain cross-class. How's that?
Clay said:I thought his advice was to ignore it, why drag on for another paragraph? No need to start calling him 'troll' or what-not after you just agreed to stop, or i'm assuming you agreeing with the advice to be the same.
But that's the point. To get nothing at those levels. Does a Paladin deserve more abilties when he gets dead levels? Or a Ranger? Druid? Bard?
Adding skills, as suggested, is nice, but if the fighter was skillful you wouldn't need the rogue.
Brother Shatterstone said:One small note: In each post, other than your own, you will see a small triangle. This triangle is the report post button. You simply wait for the new page to load, type in why, and send it on its way.
Don’t worry I already got post 73 Submitted.
Felon said:Apparently someone thought so. All of those classes gain abilities in 3.5e to fill in the dead levels.
Sravoff said:Do spells count here?