Hairfoot said:w00tHaXXor von ROFL III
This is too awesome not to start plotting a character around.
Hairfoot said:w00tHaXXor von ROFL III
pawsplay said:Other than fighter-mage, fighter/magic-user, fighter-caster, and so forth, of course.
Change for its own sake is not evolution.
In my mind's eye I see a character with a +2 vorpal moustache.Kaffis said:This is too awesome not to start plotting a character around.
A wizard is a character that... uses magic. Sorcerer... same thing. Therefore, since both classes are, in fact magic-users, how can the term Fighter/Magic-user (or FM-U) not apply? In addition it is actually defined by it's own context. How can a self-defining phrase be more confusing than a term that was intended for a specific monster/class combination which has been bastardized into a generic term?Hussar said:FM-U? And you think Gish is confusing. Let's see, it's been years since wizards were called a magic-user, Gish can also refer to a fighter/sorcerer, or any other combination of combat class and arcane spell user.
pawsplay said:650k hits on Google, and it's not the name of a Smashing Pumpkins album.
As Henry Kissinger said, "the politics are vicious precisely because the stakes are so small".Flynn said:What I dislike more than the use of a term I feel sounds stupid is watching people verbally attack one another for using/not using it. I mean, of all the things we have to argue about, the use of the word "gish" is perhaps the silliest of them all.
Storminator said:But this change is faster.