blargney the second said:
Miko is an unsympathetic character, and it seems to be a very deliberate literary choice on Rich's part.
The strange thing is, for as utterly unsympathetic as she is, she still has a lot of fans. She's got some outright rabid fans on Rich's forums, and more than a few dedicated ones here.
Miko Miyazaki is literally a "how not to be a Paladin" example, which was eventually cashed in when she fell. I've always maintained that she was even in the beginning only barely LG, much closer to LN (and if wasn't explicitly a Paladin and thus LG, most people would have presumed her to be LN). She's bloodthirsty, unforgiving, merciless, and has the serious problem of believing anybody who disagrees with her or opposes her in any way is evil.
Now she's got the delusion that everybody who she opposes (Redcloak and Xykon, the OotS, Hinjo and Shojo. . .ect) is part of one vast evil worldwide conspiracy to take over the world and deprive her of her role as leader of the Sapphire Guard, and that her gods have a special plan for her to defeat them all.
As satisfying as it would be for her to go Blackguard and the OotS and Hinjo utterly defeat her, I still believe her most likely path is a "redemption in death" thing where she does get her paladinhood back, but only in death or right before her death (also fitting with the whole Samurai motif of the character). Redcloak is low on spells (using his last Harm for example), Xykon is getting pretty beat up by Soon from the sounds of it, and is probably low on spells himself, and the ghost of Soon might be able to talk sense into her, maybe.