isoChron said:
Nice try to push my Pali to high level but he was Fighter 10 then Ranger and Paladin (Torm) 'till 15th. Actually Ftr10/Rgr2/Pal3. And no he didn't have a mount. I never mentioned a "Paladins Mount".
That character isn't a
Paladin at all. It's a
Fighter, with a splash of front-loaded ranger and a splash of front-loaded paladin. Your mention of "the paladin" in your description of the encounter was misleading.
I was talking about a group traveling through the north of Tethyr after some heavy fighting with a troll/ork army at Eshpurta. All we had were light and heavy warhorses. In our campaign you don't get holy avengers and special mounts on the fly over night. In 3.0 it wasn't that useful to have a paladins mount if you teleport a lot.
Then why weren't you teleporting? ^_^
I don't know your style of play but please don't call someone a liar you don't know. Your arguments are based on assumptions made from YOUR gaming experience not ours.
No, my assumptions were made based on the RAW, alone. My first group didn't blow wads of cash on permanent spells and such, either - but the Wizard DID get permanent
see invisible, just because it IS far too useful for at least ONE person in the party to have that spell functioning 24/7.
And please don't asume your choices are the best another group could have made in another complete different campaign/situation.
What choices?
I described
real-world spacing issues - just by dint of how many people you had, and the fact that you were riding, you should've been too far apart to catch BOTH ends of your party with a single fireball.
Add to that, your comment that they were all WARhorses. That means
stallions, and that means no riding side-by-side, either. Because I do mean
stallions, not mares or even geldings. A warhorse
needs the aggression of
intact testosterone-producing gonads ... or it's just a riding horse, at
best. A minimum of ten feet, in all directions, between such horses, I'd say.
As mentioned we didn't have permanency in our group. Are these wizards now a dump pack because they didn't have this one spell. They chosed other spells that fitted their situation more.
No, but they should then have arranged between them to keep the party blanketed in
cast spells that would serve similar purpose, or to craft
items of similar function.
And I never said we were on enemy territory. That's one thing you said, not me. We were travelling on the road in Amn because in Amn it's not allowed to use teleportation spells and we had some places to visit along the way to Athkatla.
Wait, above you said TETHYR, now it's AMN. *opens his FRCS and checks the maps* While Tethyr and Amn are adjacent, they're not the same place. So, which
was it ... Tethyr ... or Amn?
And another point is that you still can't get True Seeing permanent on yourself, even if the fighter has spend his 2 skillpoints per level in UMD instead of ride, jump, climb, knowledge or whatever other nice skills are out there. (This would make +7.5 ranks in UMD vs. 3 checks to use a scroll with UMD.
1. Decipher Script 25+spell level=DC30.
2. Emulate Spell ability DC 20 gives your caster level as result-20 ... must be 9 or better to cast from a scroll without problems
3. Emulate Ability Score (WIS 15) gives you a virtual score of result-15. You need 30 to get there ...
not that easy, or ?)
PHB page 85, DC for using a scroll is 20 plus spell-level. And that's
one roll, all you have to do, once the spell is deciphered. DC20 to activate the Wand ofRead Magic in order to decipher it check-free.
And True Seeing is NOT on the list of possible spells given in the PHB list. Even not in T&B.
If your DM houseruled that, nice for you. But that's not covered by the rules.
Beg to differ; it COULD be researched, per the Permanency rules. Ergo, it doesn't have to be 100% house rule.
I'm a little bit dissapointed about your way to draw conclusions on a basis of little information. That's ok for you but to call someone a liar is a totally different thing.
You said - and I quote - "pal/ftr/rgr" ... and by listing paladin FIRST, it's entirely logical to assume that Paladin was the class with the most levels.
You also merely said, earlier, - and again, I quote:
And some of our group had a better INI than the wizi. The Paladin for example. He managed to get his bow and strung it ... before his horse (and most other) was blast to death by a fireball.
"The paladin". "His horse". Logical conclusion, the horse was the paladin's Mount. In combination with the above, logical assumption is 10-ish levels of Paladin.