Patryn of Elvenshae said:
Welcome to the English-Speaking World where, unlike such Ivory Tower Elitist Languages like French*, we're allowed to modify the usage of our language on our own. It's very liberating - you should try it!<SNIP>
Actually, it isn't because of literary liberation, but illiteracy running rampant at an alarming rate in English speaking schools. BTW I also noticed the little wink at the end so I am sure that most of your post is at least jesting in tone, however, I feel there
IS a real problem with English being spoken incorrectly, especially in America. Particularly at a time where the debate over an official American language (particularly Spanish) frightens the Habeous Corpus out of me.
drothgery said:
AFAIK, they has been used informally for a single person of indeterminite gender roughly since ye fell out of use. In 19th/20th century formal use, it's not, but that convention seems unlikely to last; between force of habbit on one-hand and avoiding charges of sexism on the other, I expect singular they to be acceptable to your English teacher any day now.
One more reason to bring back 'old' Modern English

(ye, yeah, thou, etc are actually Modern English, not Ollde Englush for those of you that are not linguistics students. Don't believe me, read
Beowulf in the original format, I had to in High School as a Freshman and nearly broke my brain.)
But casual usage should not necessarily dictate English rules, for if that were such a case then: idear (New England), warsh(Mid-Atlantic/Midwest), acrost(Midwest Plains) and various other bastardizations would be fair game and that scares me beyond colloquialism.