• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Q'Barra: Facing Truth OOC

Rookseye said:
Pebele, Shayuri, let me know if you'd like to do a little research on construct feats to help out too, I have an issue of Dragon that details construct familiars in good detail. I'd be more than happy to check it out and post anything relevant to what you are looking to do. :)

Awesome! I have actually subscribed to Dragon for some time, but for the life of me I don't remember that issue. Do you happen to remember which issue it was in?

Also, Shayuri? Are you still with us? You haven't posted in a couple days, and we need Trebuchet's action to move on.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Argh, sorry. I missed that. Been a busy couple of days. I'm moving this week, so...

But I'll post immediatement!

And any crunch regarding construct familiariage is welcome!
 

I'll check tonight when I get home, it was a fairly recent issue, great big golem being forged on the cover, if I remember correctly.
 


EvolutionKB said:
Ouch that must have been some good rolling for that dino...On another note, Shayuri, have you looked at the item familiars from the SRD?

Yes, unfortunately the dino has been rolling better than any of my characters have ever rolled. Well, I suppose it's my character, so that's ok. Maybe.
 

Ok, I actually found the issue of Dragon that Rookseye was talking about.

It looks like in order to use a construct familiar Trebuchet will need to have the Improved Familiar feat.

So, what I can do is I can allow you to change your 3rd level feat choice to Obtain Familiar, and then use your 6th level feat to gain Improved Familiar.

In the issue of dragon, there were two flying familiars that would be available to Trebuchet right off the bat, a Razor Hawk and a Glass Dragonfly. These are in issue 341, if you have Dragon available. If not, then I can write out their descriptions here for you.

If neither of those will work, we can work together to use them as a template to design your own familiar.

Seem fair?
 

(OOC: Ok, since I really have no idea what's going on with ENWorld, I'm going to try to email everyone so that we can make alternate arrangements for continuing the game.

If I don't get to you, or if you don't get email's from ENWorld, you can email me at Pebele@gmail.com)
 

Seems quite fair, actually. But I'm not sure I wanna spend 2 feats on a familiar, especially one that's just an 'eye in the sky' so to speak.

Too many things to get. Warmage Edge, spell foci...his first priority must be to be a blasty mage, after all. :)

I'll think about it...as a party, we really don't lack for recon ability, so it's probably not worth it in the final analysis.

Thanks though!
 

Shayuri said:
Seems quite fair, actually. But I'm not sure I wanna spend 2 feats on a familiar, especially one that's just an 'eye in the sky' so to speak.

Too many things to get. Warmage Edge, spell foci...his first priority must be to be a blasty mage, after all. :)

I'll think about it...as a party, we really don't lack for recon ability, so it's probably not worth it in the final analysis.

Thanks though!

Ok, no problem. Let me know if you change your mind. :)
 

Hey Pebele, I'm going to go ahead and modify Catherine's progression chart based on what we discussed. Just a heads up.

Thanks!
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top