• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Question for the grognards: Why does D&D have dwarves/elves/hobbits etc.?

Celebrim said:
Would you please reread what I wrote again.



*points at his name*

I'm a pretty big Tolkien fan too. I have more skill ranks in Tolkien than I have in anything useful. And I can spell his name. And not just his last one.

My guess is that EGG is philosophically opposed to JRRT, just as JRRT would be philosophically incompatible with EGG. Except for being rather opinionated, having large vocabularies and deeply fascinated by history, you could hardly find a more different individuals who had drawn more different lessons from history than EGG and JRRT. I don't believe that EGG is just maintaining a legal fiction.

Sorry sweetheart, I'll pass you a Kleenex.

Oh, wow, a name was mispelled, by one letter. Do you have a point? Are you getting huffy for any real reason?

My original statement wasn't meant to insult you at all. You didn't have any reason to condescend to me with the quotes above.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darklone said:
That's right. Yet, pigs make "Oink"... in German not toooooo unlikely to "ork".

Eber, Bache, Frischling... nothing really sounds like Orc.

It's pretty handwaving though.

Hmmm...in reading the Wikipedia entry on "orc", there's mention of the Gaelic / Irish word "orc", which means "young pig". Maybe I confused German and Gaelic in my recollection of the story (said recollection is probably 25 years old...)
 
Last edited:




Funny thing is, IIRC, orcs are never really described physically in Tolkien, so, they could look like anything. But, savage race that sees in the dark, hates elves and wants to conquer the world is pretty darn close thematically. :)

It's kinda funny in a way when you think about it. D&D, purportedly, started out as a game to play in a S&S setting, rather than a high fantasy one like Tolkien. But, when D&D became very popular, likely the only fantasy that most players had read was high fantasy - in the late 70's, it wasn't easy to find S&S fantasy, or at least as easy as JRRT. Besides that, most players had likely read JRRT in school.

So, the game moves from a S&S pulp feel, into a more high fantasy one. We can see that easily in the move from Greyhawk, through Dragonlance and into Forgotten Realms. DL proved that high fantasy was a popular setting. Forgotten Realms simply moved with the trend.

Forward through the end of 1e and through the 2e days. High fantasy becomes the norm for most supplements. Sure, there are exceptions like Dark Sun, but, Forgotten Realms and a host of other settings remain solidly high fantasy.

Then the late 90's early oughts come. The market for reprint pulp fantasy has bloomed. S&S books and authors long out of print are suddenly popping up again. And people like it because they're bloody sick of high fantasy. And D&D follows right along. The whole "Back to the Dungeon" schtick is exactly that. Modules and settings come out that are very much riding on the resurfacing popularity of S&S fiction - Scarred Lands, Eberron, Freeport etc.

I imagine that ten years down the line, we'll see things swing back the other way again.
 




frankthedm said:
Which were fairly close to the Gamorrean guards of Jabba'a Palace in 1983's ROTJ.
I think I'd invert that statement. Jabba's guards looked just like the orcs depicted in the original Monster Manual. That's certainly what my friends and I thought at the time -- Wow, orcs!
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top