Yes typos indeedFirst, I like it. This is a method that could work. That being said, a few comments:
They get 2 slots way too early. A level 1 warlock only has 1 slot. There should be 1-2 levels with one slot only.
The wildercraft - the thing that replaces the warlock's evocation? brilliant.
I haven't looked at the other features of the ranger to see if you changed something. But I would adopt that casting style in a 5e campaign over the current casting method.
A third warlock subclass? Now that’s something I never considered before. Interesting!I use half and third warlock a lot on npcs I like the 2 spell slots with spells known
and you are right, there should be only one spell slot at level 2nd, and two slots from level 3rd and on. I’ll correct it when I get to my computer. Thanks for spotting those
.In this case I’d reduce the amount of crafts (invocation) a bit as some of the original features became wildercraft options
I will have to look at that tomorrow - off to bed for me!the beast master remake could also be used independently on an otherwise vanilla ranger.
Yup. Take I even made a rogue subclass based off arcane trickester for it onceA third warlock subclass? Now that’s something I never considered before. Interesting!
Looking at the other half-spellcasters (ranger, paladin, artificer), the "half" part is calculated as such:You are welcome. I thin though... I would have the ranger get their 2nd slot at level 4, double the level of a warlock (who gets their second slot at level 2). Perhaps I haven't understood how the spell-casting is halved?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.