Shadowdancer's Hide in plain Sight

For one thing, Hide in Plain Sight does not tap the Plane of Shadow. HiPS does not mention in its text as having the Shadow descriptor, but for more proof, the Manual of the Planes does not list HiPS in the extensive listing of official D&D spells and abilities that utilize the Planes. 3.5 did not override the MotP's listing in this regard, so HiPS is definately still not a Shadow effect. Just FYI, there is no way that HiPS taps into the Plane of Shadow. The Shadowdancer's own skill with using magic for stealth is what makes HiPS function.

Hide in Plain Sight also is not an illusion. Anything that is an illusory effect will state as much in its description or in whatever default rules exist for such effects (i.e. the DMG says that magical armors and similar magic items are considered to have an aura of Abjuration to Detect Magic, unless noted specifically otherwise in the magic armor's description, so it can be assumed that for all armors, their magic if any is Abjuration). Likewise, unique spell-like and supernatural effects that count as Enchantments, Necromancies, or whatnot will mention them in their descriptions, otherwise they have no default school of magic, just as the spell Wish does not have a school of magic.

There is no way HiPS is an illusion, and no way it draws on the Plane of Shadow. There's two baseless myths dispelled, goody.

Now, since it cannot be illusory nor shadowstuff-based, how to adjudicate Hide in Plain Sight? It's not invisibility either, and is not mentioned nor described as mind-affecting or the like, so leaves few options. Obviously, activating HiPS causes the character to seemingly disappear, since it works even when being observed by other folks, but that's just a trick of the supernatural effect. The Shadowdancer thusly seems to disappear, but really could be found hiding in whatever shadow is nearby, so someone looking into that shadowed area (via a successful Spot check) would notice the Shadowdancer hiding there. Yet, the Shadowdancer remains physically outside the shadow, so how does this work?

The only logical recourse I can offer, given the terribly sparse wording of the ability and the already-disproved commonly-held possibilities, is that the Shadowdancer stays where they are and moves as desired, while the supernatural Hide in Plain Sight ability distorts reality to make the Shadowdancer appear in the nearby shadows, without actually moving the Shadowdancer into those shadows. Unlike invisibility, light doesn't just go around the Shadowdancer and flex back into its normal path as though uninterrupted, it actually impacts the Shadowdancer and thus makes them visible (sight is really just eyes picking up the light reflected off of things), but instead of reflecting/refracting off of them as normal to be seen by others, it first gets bent around 10 feet away into the shadows, then bent back into its normal path of refraction, etc. Since it's more of a very minor, weak, spacial-bending magic, it's universal instead of illusory.

True Seeing reveals invisible creatures, illusions, and such, and penetrates darkness, so you could presume that it would reveal the Shadowdancer hiding in the dark shadow behind another creature or object..... But then, you have to remember; the definition of a shadow is not merely a darkened area or the absence of light, it is an area where little or no light reaches because of an opaque (non-transparent) obstacle blocking the light's path. A shadow is the dimly-lit area behind something that light is striking, so the Shadowdancer isn't really 'hiding' in the shadow behind his or her ally; that's silly, shadows aren't dark enough to hide anything by themselves; only things that are already very small/thin and darkly-colored will be hidden by a mere shadow; you need true darkness to actually hide something, and you only get that when an area is isolated from light sources.

The Shadowdancer is hiding behind his or her ally, or behind that corner of the building, or in that deep pit over there. He/she's physically standing in plain sight, but appears to be hiding behind the cover of some object/creature/terrain feature. Your True Seeing can no more see the Shadowdancer hiding behind that orc than your True Seeing could see a stirge clinging to the orc's back, because True Seeing doesn't give you X-ray vision to see behind obstacles. The Shadowdancer simply cannot be hiding in the orc's shadow itself, because shadows alone aren't dark enough to hide in, but the Shadowdancer can use their mystical ability to Hide in Plain Sight, appearing to be standing right behind the orc, mimicking the orc's movements perfectly to where the orc blocks your view of them.

You could still spot that stirge or Shadowdancer if you moved around to a better angle where you could see slightly behind the orc, and notice that thing hiding on its back, the sleeping stirge. The HiPS ability merely needs suitably large enough shadows nearby so that they can be used as a conduit for the magic, traveling along the path of the shadow to the object/creature casting that shadow, in order to properly bend light just right so as to make the Shadowdancer appear to be hiding behind the orc/whatever, the proper distance away, in the proper shape/dimensions.

This is the only logical way I can see Hide in Plain Sight working, given its sparse text and what marginally-related hard and fast rules and examples are given in the PHB, DMG, and MM.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Thanee said:
Right, in that case, I would probably ban the ability (unless it made any sense), or house rule it to (Su). :p
Do you ban evasion (or maybe even all Reflex saves) when there is no room to move?
 

Thanee said:
Then what does the shadowdancer's ability represent?
How does the shadowdancer hide with nothing to hide behind?
How comes, that noone can see the shadowdancer, altho he is standing right in full view, with nothing blocking normal sight, no cover and no concealment?

Yes, the problem lies in the way they left this to the imagination, doesn't it?

But if you check my previous post, I provide a conveniently rules-conforming flavour text summary of how the shadowdancer uses shadows to hide. It wasn't hard to come up with something. Let's assume for a moment that maybe the shadowdancer isn't trying to hide behind magical concealment. Instead, let us assume that he's using magic to manipulate his environment (more like a transmutation than an illusion) in order to make up for his lack of concealment. There, better now?
 

Thanee said:
Do you even have an explanation, why they say "simply hiding" instead of just "hiding", when it is (according to you) irrelevant and meant to apply to all hiding, anyways?

Why put the restrictive qualifier there?

Bye
Thanee

As opposed to being invisible.
 

First, a shadowdancer can use her HiPS ability even with shadows that cannot fulfill the concealment requirement for the Hide skill.
Yes, of course. As written in the description, any shadow within 10' that is not the Shadowdancer's own shadow.

So if she's using such a shadow, this shadow cannot be "somehow used for concealment" because it does not provide the necessary concealment in any case. So the shadowdancer must instead do something less direct with the shadow, which may or be not related to the concealing power of darkness.
Says who? If that is your opinion, that's fine for your game. But you're missing out on what is stated. When it specifically states that also the Shadowdancer cannot hide in her own shadow, it is directly inferring that the Shadowdancer uses other nearby shadows to hide in. Where did you get that the nearby shadow cannot be used for concealment, when it is an explicit requirement for the ability to be used in the first place? Where in the description of the ability did you get that the Shadowdancer must do something less direct with the shadow? I must have missed that part! And since having a shadow within 10' is a requirement for Hide in Plain Sight to work, it definitely is related to the concealing power (or lack thereof in the face of True Seeing) of darkness.

Going by the RAW, saying (for example) her power of hiding is fueled by the mere proximity of shadows makes much more sense than saying she "somehow uses this other shadow ... to hide within."
So, making something up and disregarding the description in favor of "the proximity of shadows fueling her power to hide" (which is a skill not a power) makes more sense than the shadows somehow hiding the shadowdancer? Something that is implied in the description anyway! Of course, if its a game you're running, you're free to do so, but nothing in the description, as written, comes even close to supporting that idea.

Second, she isn't actually in the shadow so the ability to penetrate the shadow is not helpful.
Again, this is not something specified in the item description so your claim that the shadowdancer is not in the shadow is invalid for purposes of this thread and not your own game. It is directly implied that the shadowdancer uses the shadow to somehow hide in. And I say "somehow" because I cannot think of how, short of magical concealment, that someone could use a shadow in which to hide. And magical concealment is something that True Seeing overcomes. Maybe there is a 'reality warp' or whatever which allows the shadowdancer to hide? That would be a displacing effect which is something that True Seeing specifically beats.

Unless you're going to argue darkvision would also trump HiPS (unless magical darkness is used, which darkvision is useless against).
Darkvision? That has nothing to do with this issue. You're trying to compare apples and oranges and muddy up the issue. Darkvision vs. Hide in Plain Sight is an entirely separate issue. You're trying to use my arguments on one issue against me on an entirely different issue.
 

Just cause I love these HiPS threads

Says who? If that is your opinion, that's fine for your game. But you're missing out on what is stated. When it specifically states that also the Shadowdancer cannot hide in her own shadow, it is directly inferring that the Shadowdancer uses other nearby shadows to hide in.
It does not infer this.

Where did you get that the nearby shadow cannot be used for concealment, when it is an explicit requirement for the ability to be used in the first place? Where in the description of the ability did you get that the Shadowdancer must do something less direct with the shadow? I must have missed that part! And since having a shadow within 10' is a requirement for Hide in Plain Sight to work, it definitely is related to the concealing power (or lack thereof in the face of True Seeing) of darkness.
The description of HiPS says "As long as she is within 10' of some sort of shadow, a shadowdancer can hide herself from view in the open without anything to actually hide behind. She can not, however, hide in her own shadow.

Its an on/off effect - are there shadows within 10 ft?
Yes - HiPS works
No - HiPS doesn't work
The shadows don't do anything according to the description of HiPS other than set the condition that allows HiPS to work.

The HiPS ability negates the need for

cover ("a shadowdancer can hide herself from view in the open without anything to actually hide behind")

or


concealment (as described in the PH on pg 152 "To determine whether your target has concealment from your ranged attack, choose a corner of your square. If any line from this corner to any corner of the target’s square passes through a square or border that provides concealment, the target has concealment." and "You can use concealment to make a Hide check.") Since she can be anywhere within 10' of a non-personal shadow she isn't getting concealment from it according to the rules on Concealment.

Since HiPS negates the requirements of cover or concealment within 10' of a non-personal shadow how does the ability to see through concealment stop the hider's HiPS ability from working? True Seeing allows a character to pierce certain types of magical concealment, HiPS allows a character to hide without concealment. From my reading of the RAW, True Seeing doesn't trump HiPS.

YMMV
 

Haven't read the whole thread yet, so my apologies if this is a repeat.

Anyone remember those stories of ninjas approaching guards in hallways, blightly lit, floors designed to make noise when you apply presure, no shadows what so ever, ninja walks a straight line to the guard...and the guard STILL doesn't see them? Wouldn't the ability be similar?
 

Darkness said:
First, a shadowdancer can use her HiPS ability even with shadows that cannot fulfill the concealment requirement for the Hide skill. So if she's using such a shadow, this shadow cannot be "somehow used for concealment" because it does not provide the necessary concealment in any case. So the shadowdancer must instead do something less direct with the shadow, which may or be not related to the concealing power of darkness. Going by the RAW, saying (for example) her power of hiding is fueled by the mere proximity of shadows makes much more sense than saying she "somehow uses this other shadow ... to hide within."

After rereading that part, I think you are right, that he actually means, that the shadowdancer hides in (within) the shadow, which of course, makes little sense (and is not what I am proposing, either). :)

Second, she isn't actually in the shadow so the ability to penetrate the shadow is not helpful.

There we come back to the related-unrelated part... and my interpretation of the ability. ;)

Unless you're going to argue darkvision would also trump HiPS (unless magical darkness is used, which darkvision is useless against).

No, why should that be?

In all honesty, I think it's rather stupid, that darkvision cannot pierce magical darkness, but well, that's not important here.

The shadowdancer hides in some magically created shadow according to my interpretation.

Let me ask you a question: What do you think, why does the shadowdancer have to be within 10 feet of a shadow?

To restrict the spaces, where he can hide?

Really... there probably is no such square on the whole planet, which does not fulfill this requirement, especially not where adventurers usually hang out. It's pretty much a non-requirement (according to the sage, an area of total darkness, where technically no shadow could exist, is also sufficient to fulfill this requirement).

And why is the ability supernatural, when it's "simply hiding" or "just hiding"?

Bye
Thanee
 

Storyteller01 said:
Anyone remember those stories of ninjas approaching guards in hallways, blightly lit, floors designed to make noise when you apply presure, no shadows what so ever, ninja walks a straight line to the guard...and the guard STILL doesn't see them? Wouldn't the ability be similar?

That is EXACTLY what it is.
 


Remove ads

Top