Hardhead
Explorer
Hmm. Difference of opinion.
It depends.
Scientifically, you're wrong.
However, the term evolution has been co-opted by popular language[size=-1]1[/size] and undergone a bit of an "evolution" in terms of what it means. I put evolution in quotation marks there because that's the lay use of it, which I'll be the first to admit I use pretty often myself. Evolution has come to mean in everyday speech as a change, usually due to the environment.
In the case of cultures, I can easily see the (lay version) of the word applied, since cultures do indeed "die out." You could argue in a sort of survival of the fittest type deal. It still wouldn't be accurate from the science version of the word, but it's a pretty good metaphor. A hell of a lot better than lots of other times I've seen the word used, definitly.
Also, while I am IN NO WAY supporting the Eurpean settlers systematic wars and pushing back of the Native American population, I really don't think they were any "better" morally than anyone else. The Noble Savage has always been a myth. There's ample archeological evidence that they engaged in just as many bloody wars between each other as modern day humans do. They (probably) hunted the Wooly Mammoth to extinction. In some cases, they preformed human sacrifice. Not all of them did all of this, of course. But that's sort of the point. Some of them were good, others bad. Just like humans today. The only reason they didn't leave a larger footprint on the land is they didn't have the technology we do. Certainly, they clear cut forests (especaially in the jungles), hunted animals to extinction, ect, as far as their technology allowed.
As Depeche Mode said, "People are people."

1. Much like the word "theory," which means a very different thing in scientific terms and is the unfortunate result of a lot of confusion between the lay and scientific worlds. But don't get me started there. Personally, I blame the French. But then, I blame them for everything.
Last edited: