Should there be a "Vile/Mature" line of products?

The Sigil

Mr. 3000 (Words per post)
Just thought I would throw this out here for discussion. Two questions:

Should there be a Vile/Mature product line (distinct from the Core line)?
Should Dragon and/or Dungeon be considered "Core" material for purposes of this discussion?

NOTE: "Where the line is drawn" and "what is vile/gooey/icky/mature/etc." is a discussion for another thread - please leave it out. Let us assume for the purposes of this discussion that there is some line that can be crossed but the exact "location" of that line is not needed to answer the above questions.

I believe there should be a separate product line - I again refer to my smoker/non-smoker rooms at a hotel analogy - if you have designated rooms for smoking and non-smoking, everyone gets a chance to indulge their own preference. The smokers are happy and the non-smokers are happy. If you do not make the designation, eventually every room will smell of cigarette smoke, making the non-smokers unhappy, as they have nowhere to go in the hotel that is "non-smoking."

I DO believe there should be Vile/Mature products - since there is demonstrably a market for them. But I also believe they should be separate and distinct from the "Core" line, so that those who don't want them can avoid them (the "non-smokers"). For instance, while I have no need for the BoVD, I can easily avoid the material therein by not buying it.

I also believe that Dragon and Dungeon should be considered "Core" products... because they are already established as the "voice" of D&D. This makes them "core" products, IMO. This means to me that "Vile" content should not be included in them. Furthermore, IMO, you should not have a "Vile" periodical until you already have a "Not Vile" periodical. THAT IS IMO, REMEMBER! ;)

And FWIW, I don't particularly buy the "edit out what you don't want" argument as it relates to offensive material because there's a difference between filtering "useless" material and filtering "offensive" material. What seems to often be forgotten is that in order to filter something, you have to *read* it first (in order to know it's something you don't want/need). Reading something that is useless to you might be annoying, but reading something that is offensive to you is, well, offensive.

That's what makes "I don't like fighters, I don't need fighter material because it's useless" different from "I don't like Vile, I don't need Vile material because it's offensive." Even those who enjoy "Vile" material probably will admit that it is something that may well be offensive to others (I hope).

Hence, I think it would be nice to see Vile things kept separate from other things.

My 2 cents. Opinions wanted. Hopefully, I have respected those who do want Vile material, and I hope they'll try to understand and respect my points as well.

Again, PLEASE DO NOT SIDETRACK THIS INTO A DISCUSSION OF WHAT IS/IS NOT VILE! This is strictly a discussion of "should things be separated?" If so, how do we decide what goes where?

--The Sigil
 

log in or register to remove this ad

The Sigil said:
Should there be a Vile/Mature product line (distinct from the Core line)?
Should Dragon and/or Dungeon be considered "Core" material for purposes of this discussion?

Yes and Yes. No sidetracks or long windeed explanation needed.
 


The Sigil said:
Should there be a Vile/Mature product line (distinct from the Core line)?
There already is. BoVD is just the first release. BoED (???) is next. I hope there's more, pushing towards the type of fantasy seen mostly in Heavy Metal and Corbin graphic novels.

Should Dragon and/or Dungeon be considered "Core" material for purposes of this discussion?
Not under Paizo ownership. I would have agreed with your sentiments in the matter while these publications were WotC owned, but they have stated (IIRC) that they are moving towards becoming more d20 inclusive (rather than D&D-specific), so keeping them Core-only would limit the inherent potential these magazines could have.
 


Sure, I'll touch this subject and bring up some points that have bugged me since I was an 'impressionable' kid.

I've seen D&D go through a lot of phases since I started gaming. I was 9 in 1981 when I got started and have played everything from epic to zero level; fantasy to sci-fi; role-playing to roll-playing; and yes, I've even played VILE campaigns.

Here's my definition of vile material first:
murder, rape, abusive sexual content, self-destructive addictions, wonton abuse of slaves and servants, causing misery, destruction, and Mass-Murderer's five minutes of fame just to 'see the look on people's faces because of what he's done.'

Now, as far as I'm concerned, this stuff should only be presented as the 'bad guys.' Any situation where the PC's are required to do things like this is best left out of the game. If the bad guys do this stuff and the DM describes it as being 'evil' then no biggie. Heck, it's hard to describe a bad guy as 'well he stole Mrs. Ginny's chickens and then tied her husband up to a tree.' With all of the violence already in the D&D game and the 'real world,' it shouldn't be much of a leap to include the material above.


PROBLEM
There seems to be a lot of confusion out there about whether or not this stuff is already contained in the game..but it's just not talked about. There is also some confusion out there about what is vile: murder seems to be OK in a D&D game, while rape, nudity, and gratuitous sex is not. Really people? Murder isn't worse than rape?

Examples:
QUESTION: How many player characters have MURDERED monsters or premeditatively gone into a dungeon to plunder it and murder it's inhabitants?
Answer: Nearly ALL of PC's in games have murdered someone in a combat situation (Ok, maybe 1-5% of games doesn't have combat).

How many bad guys are described as murdering people in scenarios/publications?
Answer: 99% of them

How many bad guys are described as raping people in publications?
Answer: 5% (only VILE contents). This seems to be too touchy of a subject. Murder is evidently ok.

How many publications have bloody gore in their artwork of someone dying (murdered or otherwise)?
Answer: I'll let you decide.

How many covers have simple nudity in their artwork?
Answer: Maybe 5%. Why? Evidently bloody gore and murder isn't as offensive as simple nudity. People get their underwear in a bunch if there's nudity on the cover.


See my points? We've already taken it to the MAX. The VILE is already there and in every product we purchase. There isn't ANYTHING that you could do now and consider it MORE vile that what's already published.

Murder is worse than anything and it's practically on the cover of every gaming product (if not liberally splashed about inside).


Thoughts?

Emirikol the Chaotic
(aka Jay Hafner)
 

Yes and no

I have no problem with keeping the "mature" (i prefer this term to 'vile') rulebooks seperate from the "PG" books.

As for Dragon, or any other anthology of material; restricting it to 'core' or 'pg' seems unfair. I think that Dragon should cover all or any part of the D&D world it wants to (including Fiction, "mature" d20, et. all). I thnk it can disclose 'mature' without forcing the reader to actually read the 'mature' article.

Rather than the smoker/non-smoker analogy (I do not think that Vileness drips off of the "How to be a Pimp" article onto "Silicon Sorcery") I would use a movie theatre analogy. When you go to the picture show, you walk into the "theatre" playing the movie you want to see, though other screens at the Cineplex might have other productions you do not want to see.
 

I think that "vile" material should be kept in a mostly separate line from "core", so as to allow people to ignore what they don't like.

I also think that Dungeon/Dragon are not to be considered "core" for this purpose; they are generic magazines about all of D&D, and as such should have articles about everything D&D. There is no market nor reason to have a separate magazine for "vile" material, and it would be unfair to players in "vile" campaigns to never get new specific material in Dragon.
 



Remove ads

Top