Storyteller01
First Post
Sheng Long Gradilla said:This goes beside the point. The point of the argument is whether a warrior with a certain weapon is exactly as effective as he would be with a weapon of similar size which was designed for a considerably larger subject, or if there is a small difference that is not always easy to appreciate. Your anecdotal example does not prove anything.
Not so. As said 11 year old grew older he applied the techniques he learned on the wakizashi to the katana. Their was minimal adjustment during the transition, but nothing requiring an extended amount of training.
My problem is that the -2 per size catagory penaly is designed to simulate the discomfort, unusual weight, or subtle design differences of a weapon when used by someone other than who it was designed for (or race). The thing is (IMHO), with weapons in very similar design and size (a small shortsword versus a dagger) such penalties are usually overcome in a matter of hours. There may be discomfort, but we are no less effective. We humans do it all the time when we become used anothers weapons or tools. And yes, these differences can be as extreme in humans as they would be between humans and halflings (before mass production anyway). Once you have become accostumed to the weight varience weilding the weapon is not a problem.
Last edited: